In the past year or so, people have sent me more and more tweets that I can’t read directly because I’m blocked.  The trouble is, these blockers are often people I’ve never interacted with on Twitter.  Often, I don’t even know who they are.

I don’t really understand blocking, but I’m guessing these pre-emptive blockers are either ‘indignant’ over Canon212 headlines, or they worry – or have been warned, they might become one themselves.

Still, if the latter is the case, I don’t think it speaks well when you courageously profess your resistance to a host of evils,…

but you grow sheepish when it comes to a vague chance of public criticism.

I could almost understand if you’re a raging liberal with whom I’ve never communicated….

or even the more moderated, Bishop Barron sort….

 

but if you purport to be a Catholic voice, and I’ve never tweeted a word to you at all, perhaps you might ask yourself, “Even in this small way, why am I acting the same as people who are truly enemies of the Church?”

 

 

 

About fgwalkers@att.net

Editor, Canon212.com

13 Thoughts on “Canon212 Pre-Emptively Blocked By More Catholic Names Than Personally Blocked

  1. Keep doing what you are doing…The TRUTH is beautiful because God is TRUTH and God is beautiful.

  2. chris on July 3, 2022 at 5:59 pm said:

    Don’t worry, Dawn Eden Goldstein has been a disappointment for a long time.

  3. Savonorola on July 3, 2022 at 9:47 pm said:

    GloriaTV blocks any criticism of Gordo Bergoglio. I know three Priests that it has blocked. I am a fourth.

    • C. P. Benischek on July 4, 2022 at 9:19 pm said:

      Gordo Bergoglio! Very good Padre! Olé!

      GloriaTV blocked me too for calling out Antipope “Francis”, some years ago. Church-militant and the Remnant too. That Francis is a False Pope–I’d say, a rather important matter for the sheep—is something professional Catholic Trad Inc. simply can’t handle. For some reason. Greenback-dollar related I would say, almost certainly.

      Another question Trad Inc. won’t touch is the related flipside of that coin, that is, who is Pope Benedict. Why aren’t we organizing prayer vigils and rosaries for him? Or celebrating his 95th birthday con gusto(!), or his 71st anniversary of his ordination to the priesthood, this past Saint Peter’s day six days ago!? Is he the Katechon? Did Pope Benedict flush the McCarrickan and Gordo rats out of the ship’s woodwork or did he not? What sayest thou, Archbishop Viganò?

      To me, Pope Benedict is playing the long game begun in 1884, when Satan asked for the power, and our Lord Jesus Christ said, you may have the power. Did not Benedict say the same thing to the St. Gallen Mafia, i.e. the clerical Homosexual Network Strangling the Church…. You may have the power. But you may not have the spiritual office, aka the munus, or Petrine Charge and Mandate.

      And we the poor Sheep have the power of discernment, to discern the voice of the shepherd is always within our ken. Anyone who thinks Bergoglio the voice of the Good Shepherd is either somnolent or malevolent.

      Finally, Trad Inc. won’t touch the Fraudulent-Sister-Lucy Question, the imposter who appeared in 1967, ten years after the real sister Lucy was last seen or heard of in public.

      Can’t dry up those octogenarian gushers, or risk riling the goose that lays the golden egg, can we, Mr. Matt.

      Christ is Truth. The simple truth of these matters is plain for all to see, but the Emperor’s Flatterers. On the most pressing issues of the day, Trad Inc. is mute as a pharisee, or as as propoto as an ostrich—on the very subjects in which they claim to be ‘the experts.’

      Lives are at stake. Many have died from Bergoglio’s policy decisions. Gordois quite deadly if you haven’t your wits about you. Think, if you will, China; think abortion-tainted C-19 experimental death vaxxes—not to mention souls slain by following his perverted teaching; scandalous crêches and other gay ‘art’, and his wildly pagan and overtly demonic worship (Stang, anyone? How about pachamama bows in garden and bowls on the altar? Of St. Peter’s(!)).

      C. P. Benischek
      New York, New York

      P. S. Frank, thanks for your witness. One vice you surely don’t suffer from is fear of telling the truth as you see it.

      • Savonorola on July 6, 2022 at 9:57 pm said:

        Bergoglio actually had the audacity to correct Our Lord when he said He, the Son of God, did not recite the Pater Noster correctly. I agree with your response.

      • fgwalkers@att.net on July 7, 2022 at 6:45 am said:

        Welcome, Chris.

  4. Evangeline on July 4, 2022 at 10:04 am said:

    Because the communist mindset is insidious, like vapor that enters a room and hugs the ceiling. Pretty quickly it has been adopted by the Western mind, and everybody wants power, the power they’ve seen others have. Unless you keep values such as freedom of speech in mind, very easily we see people just plow it under and use tyranny themselves, to the degree they can. It feels good to block. It virtue signals. It says, look here, I’m not like THIS person or group. I’m really one of YOU! Leave me alone now, don’t hurt me. Probably every one of them publicly touted their block. I hardly know who Dawn Edelstein is, I’ve heard the name, but can’t imagine calling myself “DawnofMercy”. Stunning.
    I don’t know anyone else mentioned at all, but I think I could guarantee every single one of them is part of Bergoglio Church, not the Holy Catholic Church.
    We adhere to two different religions.
    Frank the work you do is so important and so helpful. God bless you and yours.
    Keep going, and Happy Fourth of July to you and all.

    • fgwalkers@att.net on July 4, 2022 at 10:49 am said:

      🙂

    • SayNoToNovusOrdoAntichurch on July 4, 2022 at 11:33 am said:

      Freedom of speech is not a Catholic value; it’s a liberal value. See how the liberal infection has spread? Even those who think they’re Catholics now speak the language of toxic liberalism. Such are the poisonous fruits of the Judas Council.

  5. It appears that perhaps a “memo” went out to certain “Catholic” bloggers on who to pre-emptively block? If you blog, then you have a duty to respond to those who question your assertions…and it may be that they do not want to do that. They want to assert, blather indefensible nonsense, and block. No debate, bad faith, arrogance. I had what I thought was a rather mild exchange with a well-known Catholic blogger yrs ago, when he suddenly became very nasty when I respectfully questioned a position he held, and told me to stop bothering him!! I was taken aback, and, of course did not respond, but have read of his treating others in this manner, so something is VERY wrong there. Actually, I am finding it helpful. I have seen a lot of these types “out” themselves as lightweight nincompoops, or outright controlled opposition. I have cancelled subscriptions to CFN and The Remnant after yrs due to illogical support of the current Pachamama worshipping antipope as pope, while trashing him. Something is not right with that. Sad, whether political or cowardice, idk, a loss in my view, but we can’t be distracted from the Real and True. We are in uncharted waters, and can only pray for guidance, and I, a miserable sinner, need all the help I can get. I find Canon212 refreshingly honest. TY, Mr Walker.

  6. Possibly consider listing bloggers/Tweeters who have pre-emptively blocked you on Canon212??

    • fgwalkers@att.net on July 7, 2022 at 6:44 am said:

      I’m not sure how to do that, but just from the one’s I’ve seen in recent years, there must be quite a few more.

Post Navigation