Not everyone dances to that Pope Francis tune

Not everyone dances that Pope Francis tune

RNS’s David Gibson reveals:

The head of liturgical music for the Philadelphia archdiocese, who was also to play a key role orchestrating the huge outdoor Mass concluding Pope Francis’ trip to the U.S. in September, is resigning his post over long-standing differences with Archbishop Charles Chaput.

John Romeri, who has headed the archdiocesan liturgical music office for five years, said he will resign effective June 30 because “there are simply irreconcilable differences” with Chaput over the role and style of music at Mass.

Romeri did not respond to requests for comment, and it was unclear whether he would still play a role in preparations for the papal visit.

A spokesman for Chaput, Kenneth Gavin, said in an email that he could not comment on personnel matters and “there are no additional updates.” But he said that the archdiocese “will be prepared for the visit of the Holy Father on all fronts, including music for the Mass on the Parkway.”

That is the third time this week the Philadelphia archdiocese has had to reassure people everything will be OK with the Pope’s upcoming visit and the World Meeting of Families.  First the head of the Pontifical Council behind the big money event is revealed to be key to a fraud investigation.  Next a key player in the WMOF event turns out to be a lesbian activist.  (The archdiocese said it was just ill-informed blogging.)

Now this.

In his resignation announcement, which he buried in a list of liturgy news last month, Romeri indicated that he and Chaput had clashed almost from the time Chaput was appointed to Philadelphia in 2011, a year after Romeri arrived.

Romeri wrote that these “several years of discontent” on Chaput’s part culminated with the music Romeri arranged this April for Holy Week and Easter. The approach, he said, “was not well received by the archbishop.”

So Archbishop Chaput was the unhappy one.  Perhaps the Pope’s upcoming visit was just too much for him to endure.  Maybe this is part of that transforming effect Chaput says Pope Francis will have on Philadelphia.

Why does he keep saying there’s going to be so much joy though?

Gibson writes:

A clash over liturgy so close to such a major papal event, and one in which the liturgy plays such a central role, could complicate what is already a huge undertaking for the Philadelphia archdiocese and the Vatican. But such hurdles are hardly unprecedented.

Papal visits are tremendously complex, stressful and expensive projects for the dioceses hosting the pope. There is intense jockeying among bishops to try to host the pope and much maneuvering within a host diocese over where the pope will visit and who will get to meet him — and how each papal event will be organized.

Then everything must be run through a committee and approved by the Vatican. The process almost guarantees arguments, especially over liturgies, which are often flashpoints for internal church battles.

Outdoor papal Masses also tend to be huge events that must communicate a sacred rite in broad strokes to a diverse assemblage. So the music and design often have a popular, modern style that can irk liturgical traditionalists.

Is it possible that Mr. Romeri felt some moral compunction about facilitating the kind of un-Catholic abomination we’ve already witnessed in Rio and Manila?  Perhaps he fears bad weather?

Many speculated that this difference in liturgical tastes might have contributed to the falling out between Chaput and his music director.

Romeri is said to have more of a “high church” sensibility in liturgy than Chaput, who has expressed a preference for the newer Mass in English and simpler styles of worship.

While Chaput is often described as a doctrinal and cultural conservative, in the Catholic church, that does not necessarily equate with liturgical traditionalism, which is its own distinct — and proud — brand

That’s what shrill liberals call subtlety.

 

 

 

 

 

tagle10

Profaning chapels due to insufficient government relief

UCA News reports:

The social action arm of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines urged bishops and priests in disaster areas to offer chapels to be used as temporary classrooms as some 25 million primary and secondary level pupils around the country return to school this week.

You may have noticed that more and more parish buildings are dwarfing the actual churches.  Can you imagine the size of the community center next to Notre Dame Cathedral if it were proportional to the huge boxes we find adjacent our churches here?  Now whatever small consecrated space remains is becoming pointless.

If you read continuous reports from the Philippine Church you’d think the whole country was a constant emergency. Once they start making chapels classrooms in disaster areas, kids will have to go to China to be near Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament.

“I think the Lord would even be glad if His house will be used in helping others,” said Fr Edu Gariguez, executive secretary of the National Secretariat for Social Action and Caritas-Philippines.

Oh look, there’s that word, ‘Caritas.’  It means love.

Second-guessing the Lord is stock and trade for these faux-Catholic functionaries.  In the minds of our social justice champions, chapels are no help whatsoever.  They confuse the inmates at their indoctrination camps.

“The Lord is always about mercy and compassion,” he said in an interview, admitting that using the chapels as classrooms is a “band-aid solution” to a problem that should have been resolved by the government.

There’s that FrancisMercy again.  Perhaps God will also blame the government for profaning his chapels and depriving His children of the Faith?  Don’t bank on it.

Someday, please God, the Lord will also be about justice; just enough justice to free us from these weasels.

 

 

al_gore_prophet

Doctor of FrancisChurch

At the National Catholic Reporter fighting Global Warming is as Catholic as Catholic gets.  Here are some segments:

The call to stewardship of creation, for Catholic and Judeo-Christians alike, extends from our most recent popes and goes all the way back to Genesis and the story of Noah.

Global warming caused that flood too!

In his teachings, Jesus often spoke of God as father of all, creator and caretaker, and especially householder “In my Father’s house there are many dwelling places. If there were not, would I have told you that I am going to prepare a place for you?” he said in John’s Gospel.

Jesus described God as one who cares for the birds in the field as well as each strand upon our heads. He himself healed and advocated for the vulnerable and those who had been left out, seen as wrong, in debt, unable to speak for themselves or who lacked advocates in the system of their time.

That’s about the most tired and politically correct biblical exegesis I’ve ever heard!

St. Ambrose, the 4th century bishop of Milan, remarked that God cares about all creation, that “the mystery of the Incarnation of God is the salvation of the whole of Creation.”

So save the planet!

“Unless we are able to view things in terms of how they originate, how they are to return to their end, and how God shines forth in them, we will not be able to understand,” Bonaventure said.

So believe in junk science?

Aquinas went on to say, as Christians and sinners, we recognize that sin “has distorted the human relationship with the natural world: We have disturbed the balance of nature in radical and violent ways. Sin damages our relationship with God and with one another, the relationships between social groups, and that between humanity and earth.”

A quick review of history shows times when humanity has gotten off-track from its valuing of creation. The Industrial Revolution brought with it many goods and allowed for the formation of modern civilization. At the same time, it brought pollution of the air and water sources, and is viewed as a trigger to climate change.

Sin distorted the balance of nature and sinful people caused the industrial revolution, therefore sin caused global warming?  Atone!

A couple hundred years earlier, in the 15th century, papal edicts forming the Doctrine of Discovery authorized European Christian nations to “invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens [Muslims] and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed … to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery,” and to seize their possessions and property. This mentality, embedded in the European worldview and the legal codes of the lands they colonized, gave justification for denying indigenous peoples their rights, as well as respecting the rights of the land itself.

Do you believe that?  It sounds like a group of papal edicts may have morphed a bit during their grouping and then a few relevant things fell out.

John Paul noted in his 1990 World Day of Peace message that “there is a growing awareness that world peace is threatened not only by the arms race, regional conflicts and continued injustices among peoples and nations, but also by a lack of due respect for nature, by the plundering of natural resources and by a progressive decline in the quality of life… Faced with the widespread destruction of the environment, people everywhere are coming to understand that we cannot continue to use the goods of the earth as we have in the past.”

He continued: “The gradual depletion of the ozone layer and the related ‘greenhouse effect’ has now reached crisis proportions as a consequence of industrial growth, massive urban concentrations and vastly increased energy needs… The ecological crisis reveals the urgent moral need for a new solidarity.”

A perfect example of the limits of papal wisdom and jurisdiction.  Whatever happened to that ozone hole anyway?

Climate change is addressed specifically in the Vatican’s Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church (paragraph 470), which says the relationship between human activity and global warming must be constantly monitored, for “The climate is a good that must be protected.”

I’m not sure how much Catholics need to pay attention to this lengthy production from the Council for Justice and Peace, but the paragraph actually says this:

Programs of economic development must carefully consider “the need to respect the integrity and the cycles of nature” [989] because natural resources are limited and some are not renewable. The present rhythm of exploitation is seriously compromising the availability of some natural resources for both the present and the future.[990] Solutions to the ecological problem require that economic activity respect the environment to a greater degree, reconciling the needs of economic development with those of environmental protection. Every economic activity making use of natural resources must also be concerned with safeguarding the environment and should foresee the costs involved, which are “an essential element of the actual cost of economic activity”.[991] In this context, one considers relations between human activity and climate change which, given their extreme complexity, must be opportunely and constantly monitored at the scientific, political and juridical, national and international levels. The climate is a good that must be protected and reminds consumers and those engaged in industrial activity to develop a greater sense of responsibility for their behaviour.

I don’t see the term ‘global warming’ anywhere.  I just see the warning to monitor the complex climate to ensure it is protected.  It doesn’t say partner with the UN to lie and agitate about impending climate doom for selfish, nefarious, and anti-Christian purposes.

There’s nothing Catholic about that and I’m sure Noah would be against it.