Easter Sunday Occupiers: There’s nothing good or Catholic about liberalism and you know it’s true.

by
..and you will see the awful horror (sitting) in the place where (they) should not be.

..and you will see the awful horror (sitting) in the place where it should not be.

My entire life I’ve been treated to explications on how Church teaching is neither Left nor Right, Liberal nor Conservative, neither Democrat nor truly Republican.  It’s something higher, something ‘above,’ yes?  It’s something other than, or outside politics; something of God, of theology.  That’s garbage.

There’s nothing good or Catholic about liberalism and you know it’s true.

I was presented with an Easter family discussion where someone I love reiterated how it’s so wrong to use ‘religion’ as a reason to kill.  It hurt me to have to defend the Church at the expense of this person’s ego, but unfortunately he was stuffed full of television and the New York Times, so his world was full of false facts and plied assertions.  Garbage in, garbage out: the hermit’s rule is one of a clear mind and a pure heart.

Religion is not only a reason to kill sometimes, it’s a reason for everything –  but that religion must be Catholicism.  Everything done, every choice made, has either a reason or an excuse.  This depends on whether it’s wrong or right, loving or careless, prudent or foolish. Only an atheist would try to separate reason from religion as if it were possible.

The same applies to politics because it is about power.  Liberal churchmen like to pretend there is something true and good in big government but God has nothing to do with the usurpation of rights to life, property, and family.  Such statist ideas, which you find in print, television, and in some contemporary papal encyclicals, contradict the Magisterium and the teaching of social justice heroes Leo XIII and Pius XI.  Their ideas are new, and they represent a ‘rupture’  when taken independently.

Now we’re about to be oppressed with a global warming/sustainability encyclical. Don’t pretend it’s Catholic when you see it and don’t try to massage it.  Measure it against the context of all (not simply recent) Church teaching.

In general this is a very poor era of popes who either enforce or permit a smothered, collapsing, and dysfunctional Church; a Church where ‘Catholic’ seems to mean all kinds of Protestants and heretics – people who show up on Easter like they’re doing God a favor.

Such ‘catholics’ vote liberal.  Why confuse yourself by imagining there are any good reasons to do likewise?

An NBC affiliate reports:

The church attendance differences are most stark when you look at Catholics.

Yes, Mr. Obama won the overall Catholic vote in 2012, but Mr. Romney beat the president handily among Catholics who attended church at least weekly – 57% to 42%. In fact, those figures matched exactly the margins Mr. Romney had over Mr. Obama with Protestant Christians.

But among more casual Catholics, those who attend church less than once a week, Mr. Obama defeated Mr. Romney with similar ease – 56% to 42%. (There are similar differences among protestant voters, though Mr. Romney won both regular church attendees and less-frequent churchgoers.)

The message in these numbers? There will not only be more people in the pews around this weekend in your house of worship, there will probably be a different body politic.

Those Easter-people aren’t united to the Church Militant, and unless something changes, will not be united to the Church Suffering or Triumphant. Hence, they aren’t the Church.

The Vatican will count them as Catholics, the press will trumpet their politics, the Synod on the Family will survey them, and the Pope will chase them because they are truly his people; but they aren’t Catholics.  They’re just liberals, and until we purge the Church of their ranks in the laity and the hierarchy, she will continue to wilt, and society to blacken.

To close, here is an Easter church-going family with whom Pope Francis and the U.S. Bishops find much in common.

 

Cardinal Parolin’s New World Based on Contempt for Powerful

by

We need a new economic ‘system’ of nice people like me.

Apparently Pope Francis’ Secretary of State Cardinal Parolin had a public discussion/debate with the President of the Italian Senate where they spoke a lot about ‘economics‘.

The Holy See calls for a “financial system that works in service of society”, condemns “the war and all forms of nationalistic arrogance or egoism, including in its financial manifestations” and promotes “an ethical sense of responsibility on the part of big political or economic agents,” encouraging “the free and efficient participation of the poor in building their own economic dignity”. Cardinal Pietro Parolin outlined the Vatican line of action in the field of geopolitics and the social commitment of the Church in a public discussion he had with the President of the Italian Senate, Pietro Grasso during the presentation of a volume titled “Moneta e Impero” (Currency and Empire) and published by Lime, an Italian geopolitics magazine. The presentation took place at Palazzo Maffei-Marescotti, in Rome, in association with Opera Romana Pellegrinaggi.

Let’s try to unpack this nest of self-righteous and condemnatory gobbledegook.

Whenever someone tells you there’s something wrong with the system beware.  They are usually trying to put something over on you.  Isn’t a ‘financial system’ just people spending their money?  If that ‘system’ doesn’t work how will you fix it?  How is my giving someone money for something not serving society?  The only thing that can go wrong is when laws take away people’s rights to their property, thereby oppressing them.

Before Cardinal Parolin’s first line is finished, the ‘broken’ system is linked to war.  Then war is linked to nationalism, arrogance, and egoism.  Next those bad things are ‘manifested’ financially.  (This kind of talk only means something in college.)  In Parolin’s mind the new non-broken system would ‘promote’ an ethical sense of responsibility on the part of ‘big political or economic agents.’

Does a ‘system’ promote things and create an ‘ethical sense of responsibility’ or does a system rely on on laws?  Because I think what the Cardinal is dreaming of will require laws; laws that force ‘big agents’ to do something he thinks is not unethical, warlike, arrogant, egotistical, or irresponsible, and serves society.

Still running with the same sentence, Cardinal Parolin’s new system will encourage “the free and efficient participation of the poor in building their own economic dignity.”

Whenever someone considers ‘the poor’ as a group beware, because ‘the poor’ are just people who don’t have money at the moment.  If you give them money they won’t be poor any more but someone else will.  Poor is a fluid condition that varies based on effort.  If they by definition have no money, how will ‘the poor’ participate in the new ethical financial system?

Finally the bigger question for the Catholic cardinal, “When did money ever give someone dignity?” Dignity comes from God and our cooperation with his law.  If you follow Cardinal Parolin’s thinking, the Holy Family would have no dignity!

The Pope’s main collaborator pointed out the need for “an economy that is able to give life to enterprises inspired by the principle of solidarity and able to create sociality”.

What does solidarity really mean other than helping others and togetherness, and what in the world is ‘sociality?’

The cooperatives established at the end of the 19th century are to be seen as models. “They were the response to the first capitalistic globalisation” which “brought huge suffering to the people of Europe and was linked to the imperialistic disputes that led to the First World War”. Today, as was the case back then, the limit to the pact between big capital and the exercise of power is an economy “promoted by people who have nothing but the common good at heart and in their minds”.

There’s something telling here.  At the core of the cardinal’s new system are nice people!  It’s a system based on nice people.  That’s the difference.  I wonder who those people are?  Certainly Cardinal Parolin is one of them.

This bare radical formula isn’t too complicated.

People with power and money = Bad, Selfish

‘New system’ decision-makers = Nice, Caring.

It’s good to know a powerful prince of the Church has such a refined moral sense.

“Big capital tends to finance established powers and the more profitable activities”; while credit is not available to the poor.” For this reason, “taking the superior dignity of man as its starting point, the Church does not give up in the face of this state of things but perseveres in stressing the dignity of mankind.” Cardinal Parolin pointed the finger at “the rather obvious link between big finance, the exercise of power and the competition between the various centres of power”. “it is difficult to establish whether priority is given to imperial objectives or finance and both fuel each other.”

I don’t know if money drives politics or politics enables money but they both have to make way, and we in the Church are just the ones to help it because we know it’s not about money at all.  It’s about dignity, and the more of your money we quarantine, the more dignity we’re gonna spread around.

 

 

 

 

Pro-Gay Slavery: It Will Stop When It’s Stopped

by
To be Christian is to hate, Yes?

To be Christian is to hate, Yes?

At The Stream, John Zmirak is coldly accurate:

If you have been following mass media over the past few days, you will have learned from an economist at the U.S. Department of Labor that defenders of religious freedom are “Nazis.” Take a moment to ponder that assertion. Roll it around in your head for a while. You’ll be hearing a lot more fighting words as we enter the next phase of Christian life in America.

Sample the hate that has been spewed at the state of Indiana in the past week, and faithful Christians in recent years, by gay activists and their allies. We are “bigots,” “Neanderthals” and “haters,” whose views must be ritually rejected by anyone hoping to keep a job in today’s America — even in a Catholic high school. Where will this end? Is there a logical stopping point for this aggression, where Christians are left in peace?

If you are in China, it may seem to have no end.  If you are in Russia, you know it ends when it’s stopped.

History teaches that mass vilification rarely stops short of spilling blood. The French Jacobins who spent the 1780s slandering the clergy in pornographic pamphlets went on in the 1790s to slaughter Christians by the hundreds of thousands. The Turks paved the way for killing a million Armenian Christians with a wave of propaganda. The Bolsheviks followed their “anti-God” crusade of the 1920s with starvation camps and firing squads. The Communist governments of Eastern Europe obeyed the same script, as scholar Anne Applebaum documents in her sobering study The Iron Curtain. The Hutu government of Rwanda prepared for its assault on the once-powerful Tutsis by incessantly describing them as “cockroaches” on radio broadcasts, which triggered a genocide.

If the media, the law and our elite institutions succeed in lumping Christian sexual morals in with white racism, how long will it be before believing Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox (and many religious minorities) find themselves labelled as members of “extremist sects,” no more to be trusted with the care of their own children than the Branch Davidians were?

Does that sound crazy to you? Then ask yourself why the German government, and the European Court of Human Rights, felt justified in seizing a Christian home-schooled student — with the apparent approval of the Obama administration. Think about the moral views you teach your own kids. Would your local education bureaucrats approve?

Perhaps Chicago’s cardinal, Francis George, wasn’t guilty of hyperbole when he said, “I expect to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will die a martyr in the public square.”

Joining him would be many Christians who affirm the Gospel in its integrity — instead of the neutered version that’s now sweeping the denominations to swell the ranks of the persecutors. See the Episcopalians and Presbyterians who are now blessing same-sex marriages; see “Catholic” universities such as Marquette, which fired a professor for defending the Catholic Catechism on this subject, and bishops such as Paul Bootkowski of Metuchen, N.J., who backed up a Catholic school that suspended a Catholic teacher for her Facebook comments critical of gay activism. With shepherds like these, who really needs wolves?

Zmirak says we should not be surprised at the hate and contempt gay militants have for Christians.  The question is, “What should we do?”

If Indiana caves and guts its religious freedom law — as Gov. Mike Pence has already promised — it will prove an equal triumph for those who are so enraged at Christian teaching that they are willing to persecute Christians.

If these zealots succeed, they will tear up the civil peace in this country, forcing millions of Americans to choose between church and state. If laws or government policies beggar Christian businesses, close Christian colleges and schools and force faithful Christians into third-class citizenship — making us virtual dhimmis, like the Christian Copts in Egypt — what should we do? What should be our response now that we know what they want to do, and are overplaying their hand, but before they complete their coup d’etat?

We need to ask ourselves some brutal questions: How should the faithful in the U.S. military respond? What about those in the state and local police? City, state and federal employees? What about religious shareholders in corporations led by anti-Christians, such as Apple?

He closes with the hopeful thought that the situation isn’t new or unusual for the Church, and it has been overcome before.

We should not let the possibility or even the likelihood of “failure” make us timid. Witness is utterly different from propaganda, more fragile but far more enduring.

For centuries, the early Christians endured far worse than we might face, dying in the Colosseum to the taunts of jeering crowds — whose grandchildren would flee the moral chaos of collapsing Rome and flock to the underground churches. All the persecution that a government like China can deal its native Christians has not stopped the church from exploding there, and striking fear at the highest levels of a totalitarian government. The battered church in Poland led the movement that brought down the Iron Curtain, through sober, persistent resistance.

Perhaps the future we face is the one that Cardinal George envisioned. Speaking of a future bishop who would someday die a martyr, George predicted, “His successor will pick up the shards of a ruined society and slowly help rebuild civilization, as the church has done so often in human history.” If we stand for eternity, then history is on our side.