We hardly get any straight talk and times like these are kind of lonely. Youre one of the few people who dont mince words, Frank. Thanks so much for being such a straight talker. We enjoy your updates so much.
And I agree with Steve Bannon. If they give us a Francis Ii, we probably cant avoid schism. Catholics want to stay Catholic. That being said, how many can tolerate an iteration of Francis. The Latin Rite is the reason to stay. Nobody wants to hear that but its no less true. Come, Holy Spirit.
If and when the white smoke finally appears, I will probably have two thoughts: first, will this finally mean the end of the 1958 debacle, or will it be some kind of a VII continuation?
Second thought, is this really a valid pope? Mostly meaning, will he be a heretic or not?
Looks like pure theater, all this commotion and media hype regarding the Conclave. Why are so many fainting and hyperventilating, when the Trojan Horse of lost Faith still stands in the city? Archbishop Vigano aptly defined this reality when he told Bannon how Vatican II had established “a new Religion of Humanity that gives doctrinal and moral foundations to the [Masonic] globalist dystopia. In the minds of these criminals devoted to the Antichrist – because it is the kingdom of the Antichrist that we are talking about – Bergoglio was to be the first “pope” of the new ecumenical and synodal church… It is precisely because of this…that Bergoglio cannot be considered to have been pope of the Catholic Church.” That would therefore, said Vigano, invalidate his actions, including cherry-picking cardinal-electors whose majority would insure his successor.
As for Bergoglio’s ugly tombstone with its symbolic pagan cross, what about similar coded messaging in the curious spacing of the letters of his Latin name, FRA NCISC US ? That the engravers were negligent is hardly an option, since we know Bergoglio left nothing to chance. He specifically chose this burial site years ago, also made sure that every detail of his particular funeral rites would be to his liking. “Just one name” etched on the stone looks so unpretentious, so unsullied, so humble, so venerable. Or not.
Once a Regents Classics scholar, I still know Latin and a bit about acronyms in sepulchral archeology. It was not uncommon for an epigraph to be encrypted into “just one name.”
For example, my guess is this:
FRA (Latin for “frater,” meaning Brother, or “member of the Brotherhood”)
NCISC (“Non Credo Iesu Salvatori Christo,” meaning “I do not believe in Jesus Christ Savior”)
US (“Ubique Satano,” meaning [I believe in]”Satan here and everywhere”)
We hardly get any straight talk and times like these are kind of lonely. Youre one of the few people who dont mince words, Frank. Thanks so much for being such a straight talker. We enjoy your updates so much.
And I agree with Steve Bannon. If they give us a Francis Ii, we probably cant avoid schism. Catholics want to stay Catholic. That being said, how many can tolerate an iteration of Francis. The Latin Rite is the reason to stay. Nobody wants to hear that but its no less true. Come, Holy Spirit.
If and when the white smoke finally appears, I will probably have two thoughts: first, will this finally mean the end of the 1958 debacle, or will it be some kind of a VII continuation?
Second thought, is this really a valid pope? Mostly meaning, will he be a heretic or not?
Looks like pure theater, all this commotion and media hype regarding the Conclave. Why are so many fainting and hyperventilating, when the Trojan Horse of lost Faith still stands in the city? Archbishop Vigano aptly defined this reality when he told Bannon how Vatican II had established “a new Religion of Humanity that gives doctrinal and moral foundations to the [Masonic] globalist dystopia. In the minds of these criminals devoted to the Antichrist – because it is the kingdom of the Antichrist that we are talking about – Bergoglio was to be the first “pope” of the new ecumenical and synodal church… It is precisely because of this…that Bergoglio cannot be considered to have been pope of the Catholic Church.” That would therefore, said Vigano, invalidate his actions, including cherry-picking cardinal-electors whose majority would insure his successor.
As for Bergoglio’s ugly tombstone with its symbolic pagan cross, what about similar coded messaging in the curious spacing of the letters of his Latin name, FRA NCISC US ? That the engravers were negligent is hardly an option, since we know Bergoglio left nothing to chance. He specifically chose this burial site years ago, also made sure that every detail of his particular funeral rites would be to his liking. “Just one name” etched on the stone looks so unpretentious, so unsullied, so humble, so venerable. Or not.
Once a Regents Classics scholar, I still know Latin and a bit about acronyms in sepulchral archeology. It was not uncommon for an epigraph to be encrypted into “just one name.”
For example, my guess is this:
FRA (Latin for “frater,” meaning Brother, or “member of the Brotherhood”)
NCISC (“Non Credo Iesu Salvatori Christo,” meaning “I do not believe in Jesus Christ Savior”)
US (“Ubique Satano,” meaning [I believe in]”Satan here and everywhere”)