Frank, please… St Augstine says “Hatred is lasting Anger” He also says that we are permitted to be angy at a person’s sin but not at the person themself.
People who commit sin deserve the most compassion out of anyone because they are spiritually wounding themselves.
“… news but not with that anger.”
W.H.Auden wrote a great little essay on “Anger” that appeared in the 1962 edition of “The Seven Deadly Sins.” He clarifies that “natural, or reflex, anger is the necessary reaction of a creature when its survival is threatened by an attack and it cannot save itself by flight…. It is the response to a real situation of threat and danger, and as soon as the threat is removed, the anger subsides.”
Auden then points out: “Anger as a sin is either futile (the situation should not be changed and must be accepted) or unnecessary (the situation could be mastered as well or better without it). Anger as a sin is about threats to our ego, pride, and self-importance, not about a real threat or danger to our lives, our Faith, our souls.
If LeoChurch promises to be a spinoff of FrancisChurch, real Catholics are in real peril. Therefore, it’s only natural to resent and become irate as more and more creepy, rather scandalous, stuff is coming out about our new pope. In fact, not to react strongly could make us into cowards, or if one wants to cite another deadly sin, guilty of sloth.
Newsflash. We’re angry because they—Bergoglio’s Legacy Lavender Mafia led by Francis 2.0 the Holy Leo— still have their grubby little Francis-Fingers wrapped around our Mother’s neck—as they continue to strangle Holy Mother Church. Leo’s Agenda is exactly the same as Francis’s—as he admitted from the Loggia.
That mission—recall well from Bergoglio what his mission was(!)—it was and is none other than the utter destruction of Holy Mother Church, and the complementary ruination and damnation of souls. Scatter and slay the sheep: ie, us. To damn us to Hell — which doesn’t exist, forsooth, and if it exists, why no one is in it, quoth Bergoglio (who knows better now).
There’s no way Leo is a legitimate true pope. Look at his roots and origins as a higher Churchman. He’s 100% made by Bergoglio: Bishop; Cardinal; and even chief Bishop-maker. The Bergolian Lavender Mafia simply would not entrust so critical a position to…a Catholic. Kasper, Gang of Nine et al. are unfortunately not that stupid.
Prevost’s election—annointed successor, encardinated and elected all by a heretic anti-Pope and his party—is forbidden and nullified by the papal law of St Pius V and Pope Paul IV, as recently pointed out with compelling logic by Archbishop Viganò and Fr. Isaac Mary Relyea ( https://www.soti.blog/2025/05/15/soldiers-of-the-immaculate-with-fr-isaac-037-leo-fatima-and-chastisement/ ) (Not to mention by that of John Paul II and Universi Domenici Gregis capping electors at 120 voters—a minor point by comparison!)
The nullity of his election thus rests on two grounds. First, Francis was a raging n’ frothing-at-the-mouth rabid heretic, openly and proudly; therefore he cannot appoint valid cardinals. Full stop. (—whether Prevost OR HIS ELECTORS.)
Similarly, Francis was—and will go down in history as—a Usurper of the Chair of St. Peter—a false pope; and an Anti-Pope—all due to his party’s (the Lavender Masonic St. Gallen Mafia) ouster—defenestration, really—of Pope Benedict, The Last Pope, of partial resignation fame—the ministry but not the Munus/Petrine Mandate or Office. This group acted in league with the Obama DeepState and Podesta-inspired Catholic Color Revolution to oust Benedict and fraudulently install “Francis.”
“Francis’s” goal for twelve horrible years was plain: the destruction of Holy Mother Church as She has existed for two millenia. Thus no cardinal can appeal to Ecclesia Supplet to save him, because Bergoglio acted in malice. They are all illegitimate—we just have to make it plain. One does this simply by stating the truth.:
“You’re not a cardinal.”
“And you are not a pope.”
“And get your fingers off my Mother’s neck.”
Thus, Adios, McElroy, Farrell (Monster-Maciel AND Uncle Ted roomy) et al., perv-protecting prelates, Prevost included.
In either case above—heretic or simply malicious Anti-Pope—putative ‘cardinals’ appointed by same (raging heretic Anti-Pope Francis) are 100% Null and Void. They reached their best-by and expiry date the moment they were named—they are all D. O. A. including Leo.
Fully 108 of such Bergoglian anti-Cardinals thus composed the recent faux Conclave.
Such a conclave cannot elect a valid (much less a Catholic) pope.
The conclusion is inescapable.
Prevost is Toast.
Therefore, “Leo” does not hold the papacy. “Leo” is another usurper exactly like Francis. He is just clever enough not to tip his hand overtly by taking the name of his godfather Francis 2.0.
Note to trads. Do not pray for his ‘conversion’ because it won’t make him pope. Do not pray for the grace of office to make “Leo” not err, Catholic or good, because he doesn’t hold the office.
Incidentally, just in case anyone was paying attention on Day 1, “Leo” did quietly but plainly tip his hand in his very first words, wherein he pledged fealty to “Francis” and stated verbatim his intention to follow Anti-Pope Francis in his “Synodal Way.”
That is not Catholic. Not only that, it is anti-Catholic.
It indicates that he shares Bergoglio’s malicious intent to destroy Holy Mother Church.
Wake up, trad slumberers. Read the writing on the wall. Remember the prophecy at Fatima of Apostasy at the highest echelons of the Church.
Rome becoming the Seat of the Anti-Christ. (LaSalette, Our Lady of agood Success.)
Are we not right to be angry! Let them repent, yes! But also let them begone!
Frank, please… St Augstine says “Hatred is lasting Anger” He also says that we are permitted to be angy at a person’s sin but not at the person themself.
People who commit sin deserve the most compassion out of anyone because they are spiritually wounding themselves.
Please, news but not with that anger…
In the Lord Jesus,
Joe
“… news but not with that anger.”
W.H.Auden wrote a great little essay on “Anger” that appeared in the 1962 edition of “The Seven Deadly Sins.” He clarifies that “natural, or reflex, anger is the necessary reaction of a creature when its survival is threatened by an attack and it cannot save itself by flight…. It is the response to a real situation of threat and danger, and as soon as the threat is removed, the anger subsides.”
Auden then points out: “Anger as a sin is either futile (the situation should not be changed and must be accepted) or unnecessary (the situation could be mastered as well or better without it). Anger as a sin is about threats to our ego, pride, and self-importance, not about a real threat or danger to our lives, our Faith, our souls.
If LeoChurch promises to be a spinoff of FrancisChurch, real Catholics are in real peril. Therefore, it’s only natural to resent and become irate as more and more creepy, rather scandalous, stuff is coming out about our new pope. In fact, not to react strongly could make us into cowards, or if one wants to cite another deadly sin, guilty of sloth.
Leo the Pope? Sadly, Nope.
Way to go Frank.
Newsflash. We’re angry because they—Bergoglio’s Legacy Lavender Mafia led by Francis 2.0 the Holy Leo— still have their grubby little Francis-Fingers wrapped around our Mother’s neck—as they continue to strangle Holy Mother Church. Leo’s Agenda is exactly the same as Francis’s—as he admitted from the Loggia.
That mission—recall well from Bergoglio what his mission was(!)—it was and is none other than the utter destruction of Holy Mother Church, and the complementary ruination and damnation of souls. Scatter and slay the sheep: ie, us. To damn us to Hell — which doesn’t exist, forsooth, and if it exists, why no one is in it, quoth Bergoglio (who knows better now).
There’s no way Leo is a legitimate true pope. Look at his roots and origins as a higher Churchman. He’s 100% made by Bergoglio: Bishop; Cardinal; and even chief Bishop-maker. The Bergolian Lavender Mafia simply would not entrust so critical a position to…a Catholic. Kasper, Gang of Nine et al. are unfortunately not that stupid.
Prevost’s election—annointed successor, encardinated and elected all by a heretic anti-Pope and his party—is forbidden and nullified by the papal law of St Pius V and Pope Paul IV, as recently pointed out with compelling logic by Archbishop Viganò and Fr. Isaac Mary Relyea ( https://www.soti.blog/2025/05/15/soldiers-of-the-immaculate-with-fr-isaac-037-leo-fatima-and-chastisement/ ) (Not to mention by that of John Paul II and Universi Domenici Gregis capping electors at 120 voters—a minor point by comparison!)
The nullity of his election thus rests on two grounds. First, Francis was a raging n’ frothing-at-the-mouth rabid heretic, openly and proudly; therefore he cannot appoint valid cardinals. Full stop. (—whether Prevost OR HIS ELECTORS.)
Similarly, Francis was—and will go down in history as—a Usurper of the Chair of St. Peter—a false pope; and an Anti-Pope—all due to his party’s (the Lavender Masonic St. Gallen Mafia) ouster—defenestration, really—of Pope Benedict, The Last Pope, of partial resignation fame—the ministry but not the Munus/Petrine Mandate or Office. This group acted in league with the Obama DeepState and Podesta-inspired Catholic Color Revolution to oust Benedict and fraudulently install “Francis.”
“Francis’s” goal for twelve horrible years was plain: the destruction of Holy Mother Church as She has existed for two millenia. Thus no cardinal can appeal to Ecclesia Supplet to save him, because Bergoglio acted in malice. They are all illegitimate—we just have to make it plain. One does this simply by stating the truth.:
“You’re not a cardinal.”
“And you are not a pope.”
“And get your fingers off my Mother’s neck.”
Thus, Adios, McElroy, Farrell (Monster-Maciel AND Uncle Ted roomy) et al., perv-protecting prelates, Prevost included.
In either case above—heretic or simply malicious Anti-Pope—putative ‘cardinals’ appointed by same (raging heretic Anti-Pope Francis) are 100% Null and Void. They reached their best-by and expiry date the moment they were named—they are all D. O. A. including Leo.
Fully 108 of such Bergoglian anti-Cardinals thus composed the recent faux Conclave.
Such a conclave cannot elect a valid (much less a Catholic) pope.
The conclusion is inescapable.
Prevost is Toast.
Therefore, “Leo” does not hold the papacy. “Leo” is another usurper exactly like Francis. He is just clever enough not to tip his hand overtly by taking the name of his godfather Francis 2.0.
Note to trads. Do not pray for his ‘conversion’ because it won’t make him pope. Do not pray for the grace of office to make “Leo” not err, Catholic or good, because he doesn’t hold the office.
Incidentally, just in case anyone was paying attention on Day 1, “Leo” did quietly but plainly tip his hand in his very first words, wherein he pledged fealty to “Francis” and stated verbatim his intention to follow Anti-Pope Francis in his “Synodal Way.”
That is not Catholic. Not only that, it is anti-Catholic.
It indicates that he shares Bergoglio’s malicious intent to destroy Holy Mother Church.
Wake up, trad slumberers. Read the writing on the wall. Remember the prophecy at Fatima of Apostasy at the highest echelons of the Church.
Rome becoming the Seat of the Anti-Christ. (LaSalette, Our Lady of agood Success.)
Are we not right to be angry! Let them repent, yes! But also let them begone!
C. P. Benischek
N. Y., N. Y.