Pope Francis Is Getting What He Wants

by

That all shall take comfort knowing Francis’ heresy comes from God, we pray to the Lord….

When, in superhuman arrogance, Pope Francis (allegedly) told Eugenio Scalfari that all who request to receive Communion will be permitted, he made perfect sense.  Of course they will.  All kinds of evil have been enabled in the Church in our lifetimes already.  While people are busy waving their arms and blaming the culture, as if the culture drove the Church instead of the other way around, things go exactly as intended.  We have specific targeted management occurring here.  The Church is the shepherd of the people, just as it always was.  Only now it’s guided by evil men.

A few weeks ago I was treated to a homily I never would have heard before Francis, wherein I learned that people are forced to divorce sometimes.  Then, during those awful Prayers of the Faithful, in which I consciously avoid a response, we all prayed for people who are ‘forced to divorce’.

In the interim we had the terrible Synod where the unthinkable was supposedly avoided.  Then ‘the Francis’ brags to the world that he’ll have his way.  It’s a revolution you know and Francis is your savior, sinner.

Today the wonderful 80-year old man who says Mass almost every single day for us,  obeys his corrupt bishops and follows even Pope Francis, was annoyed that sacristans and faithful were switching out the candles next to the Blessed Sacrament while an inch or so of wax still remained.  He’s been taking time to melt down old ends of candles to conserve wax and these Christians just waste.  He told us that Francis said whoever wastes steals from the poor, you know!  God bless Father.  He wasn’t really angry, but that’s not true what Francis lead him to think at his age.

Soon after, as the lector read today’s Prayers of the Faithful, I heard,

“For all those hurt by the changes in the Church, that they may know they come from God.  We pray to the Lord…”

Now, since most of these nasty prayers sound like USCCB head office boilerplate, I have to assume this isn’t the only parish where this type of thing is being uttered today.

Meanwhile Francis continues to drip with contempt for the faithful followers of Christ, you know, the ones who actually do love God and man, not like these monstrous pretenders.  God will judge all ‘excluders’, we learned.  His latest hateful rant sounds comical coming from a man in the Pope’s white, but Francis is by no means alone in this.  Followers of FrancisChurch are far more numerous than Christians.

Behind-the-scenes money man, and chief obstacle to whatever Cardinal Pell is trying to accomplish, Cardinal Coccopalmerio, agrees with Francis when it comes to faithful Catholics.

‘You people, who don’t care that the Pope has a heart for the suffering, only wish to keep your pure pristine doctrine from getting fouled!’

I’m no exorcist, but isn’t this the kind of thing you hear when Satan complains to a good priest?

The cardinal ties faithful bishops to the latest leak scandal but the actual perps were the same people behind original Vatileaks, that unsettling event which preceded Benedict’s abdication.  The new Pope Francis has since put them in charge of Church-wide leaking and their supposed tell-all just smears his enemies.  Why not?  They were the ones pushing Benedict out in the first place to clear the way for their own.  This is the Pope’s A-team.

The leakers make the Pope look good, but Cd. Cocco knows the game. Blame everything on those ‘uncaring’ enemies of Francis so prevalent at the Synod.

Thankfully we don’t need to listen the bilge flowing from followers of FrancisGospel.  All we have to do is look at them.

Quite the innocent looking mug

Quite the innocent looking mug

 

This high-ranking official FrancisVatican leaker looks like a gender studies prof.

This high-ranking official FrancisVatican leaker looks like a gender studies prof.

 

If you need more examples, spend a little time listening to the serpentine growl that emanates from Obama’s Cardinal Wuerl.

It’s no time to pretend these invaders are among the faithful.  They rule over the Church but they aren’t part of it.  They love and respect Christ even less than they do you.  That’s why they want sacrilege.

Francis is getting his way, and so are all his friends.  We have to stop treating them like they care.

 

 

 

 

The Path of Truth Isn’t a Bowling Lane

by

Fr. Z who, like Cardinals Burke and Pell, usually says things which are faithful, helpful, and brilliant, has today, not unlike those two cardinals occasionally, written something discouraging.

While praising the Ancient Mass a few months ago Cardinal Pell added that there was ‘no future in it’, as if the way forward must be with the new Mass.  Here the Cardinal in his thoughtful way was trying to lend faithful Catholics some insight into the mind of the Church leaders, but nevertheless it’s a great leap to assume that there is a hopeful future for the Church the way it’s currently operating.  On the one hand, we have thousands of years of a Church only really checked through fear and violence.  On the other, we have a Church set decisively to auto-destruct in a short fifty years.

There is a proven formula.  It’s called Faith.  Why do our best and brightest lights fall down and fold in the clutch?

In response to a reader question about sedevacantists (those who believe we live in a time of false popes) Fr. Z writes:

Following the path of orthodoxy means avoiding the ditches that yawn on the left as well as on the right.  My old, late, pastor, Msgr. Schuler used to say, you can go into the ditch on either side of the road.

If truth is ‘apolitical’ as our wise, wise middle-of the road sensible friends love to repeat, then why must it be guided by two ‘political’ markers?  What is this path of Christ?  It’s a razor thin line equidistant between Barbara Streisand and Timothy McVeigh.  Only those skillful enough to tread upon the razor can know of it.

That razor-fine blade of truth which we have to tread at times cuts through the jungles of doubt and error.

It is the narrow path which Our Lord spoke of.

Wrong.  Staying on the Michael Voris side of Francis is not Our Lord’s narrow Catholic path.  There are times in history when the Pope steps off the path himself.  That doesn’t mean we need to turn the corner and smash our trombones into the wall like the marching band when Animal House hijacked the parade.

This is a leadership vacuum and it requires faith and action to resolve, the sort of thing so deftly performed at the Synod last month, not the low bleating of peaceful sheep.

In clinging to the Truth, we find great assurance in Our Lord’s promise that He will always remain with His Church. The Holy Spirit continues to (and always will) protect the Church from error.

While this is true, you sure read it a lot in Patheos these days.  It’s no excuse to stand there gazing in some useless ‘we are not worthy’ trance.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you will say, “That’s all very grand, but what do we do here on the ground?  There are radical divisions in the Church!  Instead of being the beacon of light, truth, and clarity that Christ wants her to be, we are in a morass of confusion and contradictions?”

It has ever been thus in the history of the Church.

No again.  It has never been thus in the Church.  There has never been a time where such an enormous ratio of those calling themselves ‘catholic’ were in fact heretics and apostates.  There has never been this level confusion among that ‘sensus fidei.’  There has never been a time when the Catholic communities around the world were so ruthlessly suffocated and morbid, left dying and scattered in a single generation.  There has never been so much evil in what was called the civilized world, and there has never been a pope so unfaithful as Francis.

The ‘sit there and do nothing putting your ‘faith in the Francis’ because the Holy Spirit’ advice is wearing thin.  By the way, I see Columba Bush has visited Ave Maria University in Florida recently.  How very Republican and ‘catholic.’  Well, we must respect the process.

Imagine the difficulty of a good and faithful Catholic, in the 14th  and 15th centuries, when three men appeared to have legitimate claim to the Papacy.  Whom was one to believe?

Good men and women made different choices. For example, St. Vincent Ferrer, a brilliant man of great faith, a Dominican, followed the antipopes Clement VII (Robert of Geneva – the first antipope of the Western Schism) and Benedict XIII (Pedro Martínez de Luna y Pérez de Gotor).  On the other hand, St. Catherine of Siena, also a Dominican, followed Pope Urban VI.  Both St. Vincent and St. Catherine are great saints.

I’ve never read that any of these anti-popes were heretics.  Have you?  There may have been confusion among the hierarchy, but I think most people knew both when to go to Communion and how to get to Hell.

In time, Our Lord – having allowed us to screw things up – eventually guided things back to where they needed to be.

In regard to the papacy, at least, our times, while difficult, are not as murky as those days. There is no rival to Pope Francis with even the slightest whiff of legitimacy. Those who claim that the See of Peter is vacant are hard pressed to explain just how that happened. Benedict XVI’s abdication was definitive.

Benedict appears, under pressure, to have resigned voluntarily.  What his options were we don’t know.  What does it say about the Francis papacy?   I’d say it’s pretty much what we should have expected under the circumstances.  Is Francis Pope?  Well he’s the only one claiming to be.  Is he someone a Catholic should look to for faithful guidance?  No.

The sedevacantist train of thought goes down deep dark caverns of ever-more bizarre conspiracy theories. None have provided clear claimants or, were the See of Peter to be empty, a rational explanation of how legitimacy could be restored to some future claimant.

There are, of course, good people who follow unreasonable claims and theories.  In the words of the immortal Gracie Allen, people are funnier than anyone.

And you don’t want to be one of those ‘funny people’ do you, or perhaps one of those ‘unqualified name-callers‘:  impatient, hysterical, and so right-wing you’ve forgotten about that sacred balancing act that is the path to Christ.

In the post-Enlightenment world we see things as Right or Left, but these are not the margins of some path to God.  They are a lie told to a darkened culture.  Truth is a person.  He walks ahead of us and we follow Him.  Along this path conservatives are closer to the truth than liberals who are pointed backward and walking in the wrong direction entirely.  Liberal ‘catholics’ are hypocrites whether their liberalism is religious or political.

Faithful Catholics follow Christ on His path.  People call us ‘conservative,’ but if you listen to Fr. Z you might think there were bomb-throwing nuts out ahead of us!

Don’t let disorienting diagrams bend the truth for you, and don’t blame Francis on the Holy Spirit, expecting Him to clean up all the FrancisMesses while your head spins.

 

 

 

 

 

 

When Popes and Cardinals are Heretics, They Have No Part in the Body of Christ

by
francis wave shifty

“Love is all you need”

CNA reports:

After years of both direct and indirect remarks on the subject, German Cardinal Reinhard Marx issued his most direct statement yet in favor of offering Communion to the divorced-and-remarried.

In an Oct. 14 address to his fellow bishops from around the world, gathered at the Synod in Rome, he said that “we should seriously consider the possibility – based on each individual case and not in a generalizing way – to admit civilly divorced and remarried believers to the sacrament of Penance and Holy Communion.”

Now, this Cardinal is not really breaking new ground in terms of FrancisChurch.  Many important clerics have suggested this in the past two years.  If you’re lucky and discerning enough to obtain news of the Catholic Church you know that the Pope himself has signaled his agreement dozens of times.

This should be permitted, he continued, “when the shared life in the canonically valid marriage definitively has failed and the marriage cannot be annulled, the liabilities from this marriage have been resolved, the fault for breaking up the marital lifebond was regretted and the sincere will exists to live the second civil marriage in faith and to educate children in the Faith.”

Cardinal Marx’s statement follows years of increased calls from several of the German bishops for a change in the Church’s rules.

In the U.S. Archbishop Blase Cupich of Chicago has been even more bold.

“If people come to a decision in good conscience then our job is to help them move forward and to respect that. The conscience is inviolable and we have to respect that when they make decisions, and I’ve always done that.”

That’s true.  He has always done that.  Cupich has more, and it follows logically:

“I think that gay people are human beings too and they have a conscience. And my role as a pastor is to help them to discern what the will of God is by looking at the objective moral teaching of the Church and yet, at the same time, helping them through a period of discernment to understand what God is calling them to at that point,” he said. “It’s for everybody. I think that we have to make sure that we don’t pigeonhole one group as though they are not part of the human family, as though there’s a different set of rules for them. That would be a big mistake.”

If conscience is all, then adultery can be fine.  So can gay sex as far as Holy Communion goes.  But why do these powerful bishops think that this entirely new Catholic idea is good?  Do they presume that Our Lord would approve of their change after the faithful have believed otherwise for thousands of years?  Why must we hold along with Marx that something is good now when it was bad then?

The Cardinal gives us a hint:

“The reason given for this is that civilly divorced and remarried believers objectively live in continued adultery and thus in contradiction to what is shown symbolically in the Eucharist, the faithfulness of Christ to his Church,” he said.

However, he questioned, “does this response do justice to the situation of those affected? And is this necessary from a theological point of view of the sacrament? Can people who are seen to be in a state of grave sin, really feel that they wholly belong to us?”

Liberals throw words around like blankets to smother the truth.  They say “justice” when they want to do some injustice, they cite theology when they want to violate it, and they claim to be merciful when they want to do some cruel harm.

It’s also quite callous and telling to open with, “The reason given,” as if everything the Church teaches must have some practical justification and this excuse was laid upon us by an overbearing monster eons ago.  “is that remarried believers objectively live in continued adultery and thus in contradiction to what is shown symbolically in the Eucharist”

Is this why adulterous couples are not permitted to Holy Communion, because it screws up the symbol?  Is the Blessed Sacrament about transmitting some positive message?

Can people who are seen to be in a state of grave sin, really feel that they wholly belong to us?”

“Who are seen” to be in a state of grave sin?  Does he believe that they are?

Can they “really feel that they wholly belong to us?”

No.  They can’t really feel that way, and they can’t think it either because it’s not true.  They don’t wholly belong to us.  Sin separates, and the Church Militant, Suffering, and Triumphant are united in grace.  This is the Faith.

But Cardinal Marx, Archbishop Cupich, and Pope Francis, simply by their statements alone regardless of their many actions and omissions, are not so united.  They don’t comprise the true Church because they are removed at least by their heresy if not their other sins.  When these Protestants who reject Church teaching yet rule over it receive Holy Communion, they do so to their condemnation.  That is why they want to whole world to follow suit.

Why do sinners desire approval so desperately from faithful people?  Why must we all be forced condone illicit families and gay sex?  What difference does it make what we think if we aren’t really involved?  It’s something to do with the nature of evil.

We have been cursed with a heretic ensconced above the Church, while a good pope sits forced-out and imprisoned nearby.  We tolerated men like this as they suppressed the Holy Mass of the Apostles, and used Council documents to teach lies as if they were doctrine.  They emptied the Churches and the souls of men and filled the ranks with fiends and heretics.  What did we expect, that God would transform men who hate him into a conclave full of Christians?

For one reason or another we now have a ‘pope’ who is not one of us.  Neither are most of the bishops.  Anyone who preaches societal suicide and thievery as public policy and calls it ‘Catholic social justice teaching’ is an evil crook not a Christian.

There are questions about whether Francis is pope.  They are legitimate under the circumstances.  Marx, Cupich, and others were made bishops by popes in our time.  I can’t judge their canonical status.  What I do know is that they’re not actually Catholic because they don’t hold the Faith, nor do they teach it.  They don’t belong to the true Church of Christ.  Rather, they are outside it just like the sinners for who they claim to care so mercifully.

If we are ever going to have a Church that grows, not one that decomposes, we have to stop thinking of men like these as Catholic. We must have nothing to do with them because they are on their way to Hell, and we can’t get caught in their wake.  It’s not “accompaniment.”  It’s being an accomplice.  But you may say, “It’s the Church, it’s the Church.  That’s St. Peter’s Basilica!”

You will see The Awful Horror standing in the place where he should not be.

Francis and his false bishops should refrain from Communion and repent themselves.  Then maybe they’ll be in position to decide ‘pastoral’ policy.  Until then they require our contempt, not our allegiance.