One of the most sinister fronts in the barrage of Pope Francis faux-Catholic leftist political propagandizing is his ongoing comparison of faithful people to ISIS.  After regularly denouncing Catholics who believe Church teaching as sick, twisted ‘fundamentalists,’ Francis chose last week to blame ‘fundamentalists’ for the recent Brussels bombing which killed 70 and injured 300.   Refusing to fault the actual Islamists for the massacre, our Holy Father easily linked these mass-murderers to strong adherents in any religion, including Catholics.  “We have them too,” Pope Francis loves to say.

Closer to home, this shocking FrancisTorch is carried by media pundit and former Anglican priest, Fr. Dwight Longenecker.  Some weeks ago Fr. Longenecker wrote an outrageous piece tying the faithful Catholic ‘fundamentalists’ at The Remnant, who vigorously defend Church teaching, to people on the edge of violence.

The magazine’s editor Michael Matt was quick to respond in a powerful critique and call for retraction, but that wasn’t all.  Today we find that attorney and Remnant columnist Chris Ferrara, conscious of the ramifications of such anti-Christian slander, also sent a demand letter directly to Longenecker.

This worked.  The response was quick and complete, apologetic and accurate. It also had three published versions, each progressively less chastened, more angry, and condescending.

Notice the changes in the following three segments.

 

****

Mr Matt is Not a Violent Man

March 31, 2016 by Fr. Dwight Longenecker

I have received a letter from Christopher A. Ferrara–an attorney for The Remnant which says:

Accordingly, I hereby demand that within five days of the date of this letter you publish on your website, with as much prominence as the original article, your full and unequivocal retraction of the statements “given enough rope they will move from verbal violence to physical violence” and “given enough rope they will move from verbal violence to personal violence” as they apply to the Remnant its Editor and his associates.”

In compliance with Mr Ferrara’s request I retract fully, unequivocally and completely any statement or suggestion that Mr Matt, The Remnant staff, readers and associates might tend towards violence of any kind, nor would they ever threaten anybody.

****

Mr Matt is Not a Violent Man

March 31, 2016 by Fr. Dwight Longenecker

I have received a letter from Christopher A. Ferrara–an attorney for The Remnant which accuses me of libel and says:

Accordingly, I hereby demand that within five days of the date of this letter you publish on your website, with as much prominence as the original article, your full and unequivocal retraction of the statements “given enough rope they will move from verbal violence to physical violence” and “given enough rope they will move from verbal violence to personal violence” as they apply to the Remnant its Editor and his associates.”

In compliance with Mr Ferrara’s request I retract fully, unequivocally and completely any statement or suggestion that Mr Matt, The Remnant staff, readers and associates might tend towards physical violence of any kind.

I further retract my outrageous suggestion that Mr Matt and his associates would ever resort to personal violence, or threaten anybody.

****

Mr Matt is Not a Violent Man

March 31, 2016 by Fr. Dwight Longenecker

I have received a letter from Christopher A. Ferrara–an attorney for The Remnant which accuses me of libel and says:

Accordingly, I hereby demand that within five days of the date of this letter you publish on your website, with as much prominence as the original article, your full and unequivocal retraction of the statements “given enough rope they will move from verbal violence to physical violence” and “given enough rope they will move from verbal violence to personal violence” as they apply to the Remnant its Editor and his associates.”

In compliance with Mr Ferrara’s request I retract fully, unequivocally and completely any statement or suggestion that Mr Matt, The Remnant staff, readers and associates might be angry fundamentalists who are inclined towards physical violence.

I further retract my outrageous suggestion that Mr Matt and his associates would even conceive of the idea of resorting to personal violence.

They would never, for example, threaten anybody.

****

Funny.  Oh the irony!

What kind of person can only muster some fraternal respect and decency under pressure, and then only as little as possible?  Do Catholics now need to adopt the world’s childish, angry, and glib persona too?

Go ahead, Fr. Longenecker.  Defame and malign the faithful all you want.  We’ll continue to defend the Church whether you feel ‘threatened’ or ‘unsafe’ like some student activist or not.  Throw all journalistic integrity to the wind even though you’re a priest.  You’ll only make ever more clear the stark difference between what passes for a Catholic opinion leader these days and a true, gentle Christian.

I have to confess that I’m ignorant of the pro-life movement’s platform.  I didn’t know they had a policy, which they’d defined somewhere in unison on the wild chance that the powers that be would overturn Roe, against any punishment for women who choose to abort their children.  I’m not running for president on a pro-life ticket, but I am equally as dismayed as Trump seems to be.

Abortion is murder, yes?  If it’s only an accomplice to murder then that’s certainly a very strong complicity, like tying up the victim and holding the gun while someone else pulls the trigger.  But I’ve come to learn from ‘real pro-lifers’ and ‘real conservatives’ that ‘post-abortive’ mothers are actually victims too.

Is punishment for women who abort bad policy?  I suppose.  Is it even necessary?  Well it wasn’t before 1973, but they didn’t have the abortion pill then.  Is it poor political strategy?  Well I don’t know.  It’s not like the one they have is winning, is it?

But the great Catholic opinion leader, ever ready to distill and ponder Pope Francis’s latest bit of ‘wisdom,’ Robert George, says that when Trump called briefly for some consequence for women, under hostile and abusive grilling from Chris Matthews, it was a sure sign he doesn’t mean any pro-life word he’s uttered.  “He’s not one of us,” George pronounced.

Who cares?  Who do these pompous establishment scolds think they are?  Isn’t Trump’s position even more pro-life than theirs?  They only want sanctions for doctors, as if that’s gained them anything.

Trump wants more.  Ted Cruz wants to ‘enforce the border,’ but Trump wants a wall.  A wall is better because you know it’s working.  But look, Ted Cruz is serious and honest while Trump’s just a pretending unChristian racist, yes?

Does anybody seem to understand that when Ted Cruz jokes about how he’d like to back over Trump with his car he’s saying the same thing to the majority of his voters?  If Cruz is so saintly, why does he want to crush the bedrock of America under his wheels?  I think that’s a good question.  Why, when he smiles do people not see a smile?  When he laughs, why is nothing funny happening?

Carly Fiorina once again laid out the contemptuous slur that Trump has proven he has no principles.  Why? Because he wants to punish serious crimes somehow, or because he hasn’t studied up on defensive, losing pro-life policy?  Doesn’t everyone know that ex-mother and murdered child are one and the same?  That’s what pro-life means!  The movement is about healing, not judgmentalism, and we don’t want to make millions of ‘post-abortive’ women angry at Republicans either.

After all, who does this non-professional think he is trying to be a Republican presidential candidate without going deep into our policy?  Like the brilliant, grim, and unsmiling Charles Krauthammer tells us, ‘It’s not that Trump’s wrong.  It’s his “attitude toward ‘the facts!”‘

 

 

GEORGIA BISHOPS: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM BILL VETO A CHANCE FOR MORE DEBATE!?

GAY NEW WAYS: GEORGIA BISHOPS GREGORY AND HARTMAYER ARE ‘SOMEWHAT POSITIVE’ ABOUT GOV. DEAL’S GAY CAPITULATION

WHAT DOES THE CHURCH ACTUALLY TEACH ABOUT IMMIGRATION?

CZECH CARDINAL DOMINIK DUKA HANDS CHINESE PRESIDENT XI JINPING A LETTER URGING HIM TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS.

NYT: DONALD TRUMP, ABORTION FOE, EYES ‘PUNISHMENT’ FOR WOMEN, THEN RECANTS

CRUXMAG’S ALLEN: CARDINAL SCHONBORN WHO BACKS PROGRESSIVES TAPPED TO PRESENT FAMILY MANIFESTO

ROBERT GEORGE: TRUMP’S NOT ONE OF US

MARCH FOR LIFE PRESIDENT TO TRUMP: WE’RE ABOUT ‘THE PATH OF HEALING,’ NOT PUNISHMENT

ZMIRAK: PRO-LIFE REFUSAL TO PROMOTE PUNISHING WOMEN FOR ABORTION IS STRATEGIC, AND MORALLY INCONSISTENT

PRO-LIFE LEADERS TO TRUMP: POST-ABORTIVE WOMAN ARE VICTIMS!? – CRUZ: TRUMP MISSTEPS BECAUSE HE’S A CHARLATAN!

ETHIKA POLITIKA: REMNANT’S CALL FOR FRANCIS TO STEP DOWN IS SCHISM!

CARDINAL FRANCIS ARINZE OFFENDS GEORGETOWN WITH CATHOLICISM

NC REPORTER TOUTS BERTONE INVESTIGATION, CITES REPORT OF VATILEAKER EMILIANO FITTIPALDI

SBA LIST’S DANNENFELSER: TRUMP HASN’T THOUGHT DEEPLY.  PRO-LIFERS PROTECT THE CHILD AND THE WOMAN TOGETHER?

CARLY FIORINA ON TRUMP AND PUNISHING ABORTION: HE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT HE THINKS OR BELIEVES. HE HAS NO PRINCIPALS SO HE JUST BLURTS AND CORRECTS

DAMIAN THOMPSON.  I USED TO BE A STUCK-UP TRADDIE, BUT NOW ‘MY HEARTS LEAPS WHEN I HEAR THE PRIEST SAY, ‘THE FOUNT OF ALL HOLINESS’ BECAUSE IT MEANS HE’S GONE FOR THE SECOND EUCHARISTIC PRAYER’

‘DESPERATE HOUSEWIFE’ EVA LONGORIA BLESSED BY POPE FRANCIS, SMILES AT HIM WITH ADORATION