***APOLOGIES FOR CONFUSING MICHAEL MATT WITH CHRIS FERRARA FOR A SECOND THERE.***
SELF-EVACUATING AT THE WORDS OF CHRIST
THE FEDGOV IS ARMING UP
CONTRADICTORY FRANCISCHURCH: MAYBE CARDINAL O’MALLEY “NEEDS TO BE RECTIFIED” INSTEAD.
SIOUX INDIAN, GEORGE LOOKS TWICE, BEATS A DRUM THREE TIMES AT THE CONSECRATION, BUT AT LEAST THEY DO SOMETHING.
…AND A MAN IN MY POSITION CAN’T BE MADE TO LOOK RIDICULOUS
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE FOUR LAST THINGS?
FR. HUNWICKE WARNS THE SSPX
L’AFFAIRE WEINSTEIN: TWO QUESTIONS
TOO FEW PEOPLE ARE AWARE OF THE EXTENT OF THE POLITICS AND OF THE SPIRIT OF OPPORTUNISM IN WHICH THE PAUL VI ‘LITURGICAL REFORM’ WAS AFFECTED. ANY YET IT WAS A REALITY. …
VERRECCHIO TO THE REMNANT’S SALZA: SO IF YOU THINK FAITHLESS FRANCIS IS A HERETIC, IT’S YOU WHO’S ‘DEPARTED FROM THE CHURCH?’
DOES JORGE BERGOGLIO PERVERT THE GOSPEL OF CHRIST AND PUBLICLY SO? YES.
WOULD FAITHFUL ANTI-JESUIT GENIUS, BLAISE PASCAL, BECOME A FRANCISBLESSED?
FORMAL CORRECTION? YOUR GRACE, PLEASE STOP FAFFING AROUND!
NOTHING SAYS “SWEDEN” LIKE A MOSQUE
I agree, Bergoglio is a heretic.
While himself he twists and distorts the Word of God (“Did he really say that?’ – clearly is his postmodern/satanic method), he accuses the faithful of being legalistic.
I would rather take his words for what they mean (he doesn’t even deny it – the Argentinians’ interpretation of AL is the only correct one, didn’t he say?) which is denial of the words God spoke, heresy, and follow God, than follow a heretic, be it pope, in order to be… legalistic. I wouldn’t want heretic Bergogoglio’s uncharitable accusation to be confirmed by my poor judgment.
Frank, honestly I loathe the Remnant, both the newspaper the ones I see on Sunday. They’re such complete cowards. Francis is a heretic, straight up,especially when he said Catholics must not proselytize which goes directly against what our Lord said to do. As long as they have their TLM and their comfortable click where they all know each other, they’re happy. Francis? Oh yes, he’s wonky in his theology, probably a freemason but it will pass and we’ll all be happy at our TLM every Sunday. They’re nuts and worse, defenders, apologists, enablers of Francis. And Salza was a 33 degree freemason no? Okay, just sayin’.
the problem is not with pope Francis, the problem is with II Vatican Council teaching – I think pope Francis follows this teaching …..- new religion was created during this council not by pope Francis, if we take it into consideration we would see the whole picture clearer. Can you be a catholic and accept 2VC teaching? Regarding cardinal Burke – I see him rather as a defender of II Vatican Council – prove me if I am wrong