***Now I remember: It pleases Francis that some Capuchins put a layman in charge of their province, because that kind of thing strengthens his evil hand. They put a priest in charge of the SSPX too. If Abp. Lefebvre had only been a priest, would there be an SSPX today?***
DONATE TO CANON212: 
CANARIES IN THE COAL MINE: “THANKS SKOJEC AND MOYNIHAN FOR LETTING US KNOW THAT WE ARE APPARENTLY WINNING THE BATTLE AND EVEN THE WAR”
“WITH THE AMAZONIAN SYNOD INSTRUMENTUM LABORIS PROMOTING THE RECOGNITION OF SHAMANISM AND WITCHCRAFT IT IS TIME TO OPENLY TALK ABOUT THE INFLUENCE OF THE DEVIL ON THE BERGOGLIAN PONTIFICATE”
PETITION, EVIDENCE BEING GATHERED TO ASK VATICAN TO REMOVE FORT WORTH BISHOP OLSON
“LET’S SEE, BECAUSE THE CHURCH IN SOUTH AMERICA HAS DONE A REALLY CRAPPY JOB REGARDING VOCATIONS OVER THE PAST 500 YEARS, IT IS TIME TO JETTISON THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND TO FORM A NEW RELIGION.”
THE HOLY SHEA COMPLAINS ABOUT VIRTUOUS YOUNG WOMEN LIKE MARIA GORETTI AND ANNA KOLASEROVA MAKING OTHER WOMEN LOOK BAD OR SOMETHING.
FR. ROSICA RESIGNS: “YOU WON’T READ MUCH ABOUT THIS IN THE NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER, LA CROIX OR AMERICA MAGAZINE”
A MEETING IN NOWHERE LAND
FERRARA ON THE ‘FINAL STAGE’ AMAZON SYNOD: “NOT EVEN THE RELATIVELY FEW HIERARCHS WHO OPPOSE WHAT FRANCIS IS DOING ARE WILLING TO CONFRONT AND CORRECT HIM BY WITHSTANDING HIM “TO THE FACE””
COMPLICIT CLERGY BISHOP TRUST SURVEY RELEASED. RESULTS: FAITHFUL CATHOLICS TRUST BISHOPS FAR TOO MUCH
FRANCISCHURCH: EVIL SYNOD WORKING DOC AUTHORED BY HERETICAL LADYPRIEST ADVOCATE, BISHOP IRWIN KRAUTLER
“WE’RE ALL SOCIALISTS NOW”
CHILEAN AUTHOR, JOSÉ ANTONIO URETA, ON AMAZON SYNOD DOCUMENT: THE “NEO-PAGAN UN AGENDA IS NOW PROPOSED BY A SYNODAL ASSEMBLY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH”
THE 9 MINUTES OF ‘WELLNESS TIME’ THAT FACEBOOK GIVES ITS EVIL CONTENT MODERATORS EACH DAY ISN’T WORKING.
RORATE CAELI: FRANCIS’S AMAZON SYNOD DOCUMENT IS CRAPPY TOILET PAPER?
MUNDABOR ON THE EVIL AMAZON MESS: “THIS IS THE FRUIT OF THE FAILURE TO DENOUNCE POPE FRANCIS AS A HERETIC AND ASK FROM HIM THAT HE RECANTS OR BE DEPOSED. ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE HIERARCHY WHO HAVE NOT DONE THIS ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM, NOT OF THE SOLUTION.”
REMNANT’S WHITE: SINCE JPII/BXVI-EMBRACING COMMUNISTS AND HOMOSEXUALS ARE MORE OPEN ABOUT IT IN ITALY, THE TOO-AMERICAN TERM, ‘CONSERVATIVE,’ HAS NO REALITY OR MEANING ANYWHERE?!
MOUNT ST MARY’S CAREENS TOWARDS DECADANCE
FROM THE GRAVE. ST. JOHN PAUL II BACKS FATHER CHISOLM AGAINST ARCHCOWARD OF KINGSTON, THE HOMOSEXUALIST MULHALL
FRANCIS’ AMAZON DOCUMENT JUST AS ‘TEUTONIC’ AS THE FRANCIS ITSELF.
Mundabor: “This is the fruit of the failure to denounce Pope Francis as a heretic and ask from him that he recants or be deposed.”
Or is it the fruit of wrongly thinking that Bergoglio is even the Pope?
Mundabor: “All the members of the hierarchy who have not done this are part of the problem, not of the solution.”
Or is it the many who are still calling Bergoglio the Pope who are part of the problem, not of the solution?
Whether he’s pope or not, he should be corrected and probably deposed for the heretic that he is, just as the abdication and conclave should also be legally investigated and addressed.
Whether you believe PF is pope or not is irrelevant. It is obvious he is a heretic, sodomite, infiltrator and must be deposed.
In response to Mundabor, I said the following:
Great job M, We certainly need the Cardinals to act to depose PF. Question: who will supply the financial and logistical support to the cardinals when they do this? Not to mention the overwhelming need for security. You are asking every Cardinal dissenting PF’s validity to stick their neck out on a limb for Christ’s Church. You expect them to accept the consequences when PF takes their red hats, their support, then laisizes them. They’ll all be forced to go into hiding – like Cardinal Vigano. He’s probably being hidden by SSPX, which you believe should act first. OK, but they are as dependent on PF’s approval as any Cardinal.
I don’t believe any of this is a tenable solution. PF will be deposed when significant numbers of laity support dissident Cardinals, and those laity are willing and able to financially support and secure those cardinals. If no Cardinals can be found to take a principled stand, then only a military posse will be capable of doing the job.
“Whether you believe PF is pope or not is irrelevant.”
Huh?!
How can it be irrelevant if submitting to the (legitimate) Roman Pontiff is necessary to avoid being in schism? You can’t follow the wrong head without becoming a member of the wrong body, no?
Perhaps if there were no consequences to being wrong about the Pope, you’d have a point. But the consequences could be dire, and so it’s no little matter who the Holy Father truly is. Catholics simply can’t afford to be wrong about this, much less indifferent fence sitters.
I personally, do not believe, nor could I believe, by any logic currently offered by a Salza and Siscoe, or a Steve Skojec or any other internet scribe that this heretical, sodomite sympathetic, masonic buffoon, is or ever was a validly elected pope. I say this regarding PF – “Whether you believe PF is pope or not is irrelevant.”, for those simpleton Catholics who can believe that a heretic, obvious to all with eyes, prior to papal election, could, in spite of that fact, be validly elected.
Your logic is absolutely correct. No true Catholic prior to 1914 would have disputed a validly elected pope. On the contrary, no idiot heretic like Bergoglio could have been elected dogcatcher, no less cardinal in those times and still less pope!!! I made that statement for the duffuses among us.
No Catholic is obligated to submit to error. Submitting to heresy is a sin.
The Bishops of the SSPX were consecrated without the authority of jurisdiction (which would have had the result of the consecrations actually being schismatic). This was made very clear by +Lefebvre during the consecration and afterward. Therefore he explicitly rejected the notion of the Society being headed indefinitely by a Superior with episcopal orders. The fact that +Fellay was made Superior was incidental and had nothing to do with the fact that he was also a bishop, and the current scenario of the Society’s leadership is, in fact, normative according to the founder. Even during his lifetime +Lefebvre appointed a priest as Superior over him, indeed even during the period when he elevated his bishops. This is also why you do not see bishops of the Society exercising any teaching authority over the flock. Such authority is not granted them. Essentially they are dispensers of the sacraments and makers of the Society’s priests. Sometimes I do also wish that weren’t the case.
One more point to Cam and anyone else who believes a heretic can be elected pope: What about the Divine privilege accorded to the papacy? If you believe that a pope could suddenly, while pope, become a heretic, which premise was rejected universally by theologians prior to 1914, then you must believe that the Divine privilege, that the gates of hell could not prevail against it, is currently null and void.
I don’t believe a heretic can be elected pope.
Thumbs up