WWW.CANON212.COM

DONATE TO CANON212:   

INFALLIBILITY:  JUST BECAUSE FRANCIS ISN’T CATHOLIC, THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT POPES AREN’T POPES

PETITION FOR TEXAS TO GIVE THE CHRISTIAN PARDO FAMILY THEIR OWN SON BACK.

PAPAL INFALLIBILITY IS REAL

DOES DEFENDER OF THE NEW ‘IMPROVED’ JPII DEATHINSTITUTE, FATHER MAURIZIO CHIODI, “PEN HIS WRITINGS ON THE FLOOR OF A SAUNA?”

FRANCIS’ PERIPHERAL CARDINAL SELECTION IS ALL ABOUT THAT EVIL NUCHURCH AND THE NEXT ‘POPE’

WEGMANS, WALGREENS, AND CVS JOINED WALMART AND KROGER IN BANNING OPEN CARRY OF HANDGUNS IN THEIR STORES.

TENN. MURDERER PLEADS GUILTY: “MY CONSEQUENCES DESERVE A LIFE SENTENCE.  I DECIDED TO OBEY GOD AND DECIDED, YOU KNOW WHAT LORD, I’M GOING ALL THE WAY FOR YOU.”

STILL LIKE ‘THE INTERNET OF THINGS’?

CREEPY ABP. PAGLIA’S PONTIFICAL DEATH ACADEMY PRAISES ANTI-AMERICAN CATHOLIC SENEZE’S ‘BOMB’ BOOK

AMERICAN AIRLINES MECHANIC IN MIAMI CHARGED WITH SABOTAGING PLANE. IT ABORTED TAKEOFF.

CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S LIES, AND THE FATHER OF LIES

BURKINA FASO MUSLIMS GO THROUGH BAGGAGE FOR SIGNS OF CHRISTIAN FAITH SO THEY KNOW WHO TO SLAUGHTER.

DIVERSION: IF YOU ARE CALLING FOR FRANCIS’S RESIGNATION, BLAMING HIM AS THE ULTIMATE SOURCE OF OUR PROBLEMS, OR REFUSING TO PRAY FOR HIM, THEN YOU ARE MISSING THE BOAT?!

SLEAZY AMERICAMAG:  IF THE CHURCH WANTS PARENTS TO FEEL ‘SAFE’ ABOUT PUTTING THEIR DOOMED SONS INTO THEIR SEMINARIES, THEY NEED TO DIALOGUE WITH US AN AWFUL LOT MORE AND MAKE TONS MORE PROMISES, DAMMIT!

FR. HUNWICKE ON THE NEW FRANCISGOSPEL: BERGOGLIANISM IS QUITE SIMPLY SATAN’S MASTERPIECE.

HERE “IS ONE MORE EXAMPLE OF PEOPLE THINKING THEY CAN INVENT A HEAVEN OF THEIR CHOICE

PERVCHURCH: THE MALEFACTORS ARE SQUIRMING, AND IT SHOWS HOW ‘PRAYER AND FASTING’ ARE ONLY STEP ONE.

PLANEFRANCIS AND HIS HIGH-FLYING PERVCHURCH:  “THEY HATE THEIR OWN GUTS

CARDINAL MULLER IS “LIKE A CHILD” – WELL, BETTER THAN AN ABUSIVE STEP-FATHER!

FRANCIS TALKS ABOUT GOD ‘RESTORING DIGNITY’ AT MOZAMBIQUE AIDS HOSPITAL.

About fgwalkers@att.net

Editor, Canon212.com

5 Thoughts on “Canon212 Update: There’s No Hope in Francis and His DeathGospel

  1. Magdalene on September 6, 2019 at 4:52 pm said:

    Yeah, no eye for an eye…cause the Francis never held any grudges or sought to take out those those disagreed with him…

  2. Illinois Legionary on September 6, 2019 at 7:14 pm said:

    Frank, you’re on fire today!

    “Since just breathing itself is bad for the planet, everything we do to live is also bad for the planet. That’s . . , that’s the whole point. The point is to control us.

    . . .

    “Everything about Francis’ religion of communism, of globalism, is about death.”

    As succinct a summary of Bergoglio’s heresies as I have ever heard. ‘Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.’

  3. Dorota Mosiewicz-Patalas on September 6, 2019 at 8:08 pm said:

    Mr. Walker,
    Bergoglio’s insistence that we be realistic not idealistic has everything to do with the nearly total rejection by the Catholic world of the Church’s teaching due to aggiornamento. What was established as light in the darkness deliberately cut itslef off the source of light in order to become one with the dark. The intellectually and morally bankrupt being calling himself Bishop of Rome openly belittles and despises Catholic doctrine, while it is the doctrine that constitutes the modus operandi of the Church and a translation of the world and of heaven to the faithful. The foundation of the Church is Jesus Christ, of course, but the doctrine informs all our aspirations, fears and hopes, and our daily choices. Jesus told us that His Kingdom is not of this earth. While living here, we, His followers, are not Of here.

    Bergolio and his ambition is completely for and of this world. This is why a slice of pizza is more valuable to him than the Source of all life. The need of the ever hungry stomach (give me beef, not beans! – Bergoglio’s poor scream in anger) is always above the hunger of the soul for Truth. It is inconceivable to this liar that due to rejection of Christ’s teaching, there might be a very small handful of His followers left in the world. The pompous fool’s ambition is peace and unity of the entire humanity. But where does God give us this vision? Where does Truth make peace with lies? Nowhere. Jesus even asked – when I return, will there be any faith left? Aggiornamento has meant listening to and dialoguing with (how I despise this word!) the spirit of this world, not Christ, who is in opposition to it. This world is what Bergoglio’s realism is based upon. He bends and twits and mocks Christ’s Cross to fit it with the designs of the devil. On the other hand, the idealism which the clown foolishly rejects, is nothing other than Christ Himself. With Christ and through Christ the Sodom Bergoglio and his ilk have created would not be. Make mess1 – is his order to young people. Born into a horrific Sodom, they are told to seek to destroy the quickly dwindling remnants of God’s order. What a fool! The Church were to show us God’s natural order. More of the mess Bergoglio and multitudes of his kind have spread is the last thing we need. The devil’s servants.

    I know, Mr. Walker, that I did not say anything you don’t know already. I appreciate your intelligence and wit and thank you for your daily work. God bless you.

  4. Oldavid on September 7, 2019 at 1:15 am said:

    I appreciate, again, your succinct commentary. While I also appreciate that this is not intended to be a forum for philosophical and theological discussion I feel a bit compelled to make a comment about Papal Infallibility.

    In spite of the impressions proposed and cultivated by the Enemy for an unknown long time, P.I. is not a faculty that bestows the slightest legitimacy to capricious or arbitrary papal opinions. A careful reading of the definition of Papal Infallibility from Vatican Council I reveals that by carefully defining the conditions of when a papal pronouncement is infallible it says much more about when such is not infallible. Prior to Vatican I the determination of infallibility was pretty much a matter of custom and tradition. Ambitious popes and prelates caused lots of confusion about what pontifical claims and edicts are to be accepted as dogma. It was then, as now, a definition against papalatry (forbidden by the First Commandment).

    It is de fide that Revelation ended with the death of the last Apostle so nothing can be defined as an article of Faith that was not (at least) assumed and implied all the way back to the Apostles. No novelty can ever be introduced into the Faith by anyone, including a pope, to the Apostolic Faith.

    Papal Infallibility can only ever be used to settle, once and for all, disputes that may have arisen due to misleading or erroneous fashions of thought… nothing else.

    A slyly and cunningly introduced version of papalatry and episcopalatry allowed the Vatican II debacle to be imposed on the faithful who feared that opposition would put them in effective schism.

Post Navigation