***I said “Will” when I meant “Weigel,” an understandable mistake.***
SACHS, SANCHEZ, FRANCIS, GATES AND THE GLOBALIST UN CHURCH
IT’S AN UPSIDE DOWN WORLD IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS
ONLY A PILE OF FAUX-CATHOLICS WOULD THINK THE WORD ‘MINISTRY’ MEANS ANYTHING SUBSTANTIAL. MAYBE THAT’S WHY SNEAKY BENEDICT USED IT. THEY LOVE THAT WORD.
ARGENTINIAN ARCHBISHOP HECTOR AGUER: FRANCIS IS CONSIDERED A “MORAL RELATIVIST”
ONE SECTION OF THE FAITHFUL HERALDS OF THE GOSPEL STILL HOLDING OUT AGAINST MONSTROUS FRANCISVATICAN COMMISSIONERS
GLOBALIST FRAUD, FRANCIS, RECEIVED MELINDA GATES SECRETLY
“THIS IS WHY PRESIDENT TRUMP IS, ODDLY ENOUGH, ONE OF THE GREAT IMPLEMENTERS OF CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING IN OUR TIME.” – EVEN CRISISMAG ANTI-BIG BUSINESS INTEGRALIST MW DAVIS FINDS A WAY TO SUPPORT TRUMP
HOW IS THIS NOT A BOLDFACED LIE, MR. FERRARA?
FRANCISTOPIA: “CELEBRATING CHRISTMAS MEANS BETRAYING CHINA.”
DEMOCRAT PARTY FRANCISRULERS BEGIN SHOVING OFF MOST POPULAR FRANCISCANDIDATES
LITURGICAL HANDBOOK PUBLISHED BY ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND
WHAT JESUS DID NOT SAY ABOUT HELL
TAYLOR MARSHALL AND RYAN GRANT EXPAND UPON ROBERT BELLARMINE, WIND UP TELLING YOU THAT YOU CAN’T FIGURE OUT WHETHER MONSTROUS FRANCIS IS A HERETIC.
DON’T LET FR. EVAN HARKINS’ MEDICATION CHANGE YOUR CATHOLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SUICIDE
She’s supposedly Catholic Madame Gates is.
Schneider is ” not in union” because he’s the controlled opposition Frank.
I’ve been arguing against the Sedevacantist assumption for over 20 years even though in all that time I have also argued that just about all the popes in the last hundred years have been pawns of the Synagogue of Satan to a greater or lesser degree. Even Pius XII “stacked the deck” (wittingly or unwittingly) with the likes of Roncali (John XXIII) that paved the way for the disastrous Vatican Council II. However, I always maintained that Church history is littered with ambitious, avaricious popes who exceeded their jurisprudence for all sorts of specious reasons. The Petrine succession has always proceeded through them and maintained its integrity in spite of a variety of pretenders (antipopes) and scurrilous, hedonistic, megalomaniacs.
Now, right from his election, I dubbed Benedict XVI an enemy because of his overt Modernism. He clearly subscribed to the notion that everything is in a process of “becoming” but he earned the title of being “conservative” because his notion of dialectical “progress” was much too slow for the fanatical “reformers” who would “make” a “god” that “developed” according to their convenience.
Most importantly, however, is that we’re not now confronted with an inadequate, weak, deranged, mislead, ignorant or “dud” pope but now we’ve got a supposed two of them. That’s impossible!
Thank God for order! Thank God for Canon Law! Peter was given the prerogative of binding and loosing. In the temporal sphere the act of binding is only by the proclamation of precepts and laws by a legitimate authority. Off-the-cuff blather or indefinite statements do not qualify as “binding”. (Unless you’ve got a clever lawyer, of course).
Sure! I have no authority whatsoever to define or decree who is or isn’t pope, bishop, priest etc. but I have a moral obligation to form an opinion that I will have to own up to on Judgement Day. I would much rather the Judge said: “you were wrong for the right reasons” than He said: “You coward! You knew it was wrong but you went along because it was convenient.”
David Marwick