**The sound clears up after a little bit**
**SSPX and other traditionalist groups are here and there able to say public Masses, thank God**
WHY ARE BILL GATES AND HIS DEATHFLUNKIES NOW RULING THE WHITE HOUSE?
I AM SICK TO MY STOMACH WATCHING THESE UNNATURAL MEN WHO RUN THE CHURCH TELLING US, THE FAITHFUL, WHAT WE MUST DO.
CARDINAL DOLAN LOCKS NEW YORK CEMETERIES: TOO DANGEROUS
BROOKLYN CATHOLIC APARTMENT BUILDING OWNER WAIVES APRIL RENT SO THAT HALF HIS PEOPLE DON’T FALL BEHIND.
FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM HOMES: HALTING THE VIRUS WILL REQUIRE ‘HARSH STEPS’
ALL BAD EXPERIENCES CAN BE PROFITABLE IF WE LEARN FROM THEM, AND THE LONG LENT OF 2020 GIVES US MUCH TO PONDER
THE MANDATORY “VACCINE” IS THE ENTIRE POINT, AND THUS HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE WILL BE IGNORED OR SUPPRESSED.
TABLET’S LAMB LOOKS FORWARD TO CD. PELL’S FRANCISVATICAN PERVCOURT DATE
(1) CASES ARE UNDER-REPORTED (LACK OF MEASUREMENT), (2) DEATHS OVER-ATTRIBUTED (DYING WITH IS NOT SAME AS DYING FROM), OR (3) BOTH. MY GUESS IS (3), WITH (1) BEING THE MOST IMPORTANT PART.
THE “NURSE SHORTAGE” SCAM
EXPERTS SLICE DOOM-PROJECTIONS BY 50% OR SO
THE HOLY WEEK OF CARDINAL PELL
IN MY VIEW, CORONAGATE WILL GO DOWN AS THE SINGLE BIGGEST FRAUD IN THE FRAUD-RIDDEN HISTORY OF AMERICAN POLITICS
FERRARA: ‘SCARF LADY’S “LARDER IS DOUBTLESS WELL-STOCKED AND HER FEDERAL PAYCHECK NOT THREATENED IN THE LEAST BY THE ECONOMY-KILLING REGIME SHE WANTS TO SEE FASTENED UPON THE REST OF US UNTIL SHE AND TONY AGREE IT CAN BE “RELAXED” SOMEWHAT”
WHAT SORT OF EPIDEMIOLOGIST IS FAUCI? I WILL TELL YOU: ONE ENGAGED IN A MASSIVE CON JOB.
YOU’VE GOT THAT RIGHT, TONY!
“THERE ARE NO DIRECTIVES THAT FORBID THE LAITY, MUCH LESS FORBID THEM UNDER PAIN OF SIN, FROM ATTENDING AN SSPX MASS WHEN IT IS THE ONLY MASS AVAILABLE.”
FRANCISDIOCESE OF ARLINGTON: SO WE CAN HAVE DRIVE-IN FOOD BLESSINGS, BUT NO DRIVE-IN MASS. APPARENTLY EASTER DINNER IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EASTER MASS.
CREEPY FRANCISVATICAN ON PELL AQUITTAL: HOLY SEE REAFFIRMS ITS COMMITMENT TO PREVENTING AND PURSUING ALL CASES OF ABUSE AGAINST MINORS.”
DUTCH POLITICIAN LILIANNE PLOUMEN, WHOM FRANCIS MADE “DAME COMMANDER OF THE EQUESTRIAN ORDER SAINT GREGORY”, RECOMMENDS ABORTION PILL DURING THE BLESSED VIRUS
EVIL AUSSIE FRANCISBISHOP COMENSOLI ON PELL AQUITTAL: “SOME WILL BE COMFORTED; OTHERS WILL REMAIN DISTRESSED.”
Looks like vaccines and/or 5G more likely to kill you.
You mentioned you have no opinion about the SSPX conflict. And so I did a quick bit of research. What caused the withdrawal of Canonical status.
What I found is that what Arbp LeFebvre and the Society faced then is the same conflict we face today. The same!
Will we or will we not remain in communion with the Modernist heretics within the Apostolic line and occupying the Papacy.
In 1974, this conflict between SSPX and the Hierarchy came out into the open with an Apostolic Visitation by two Belgian Priests. The Inquisitors, however, were themselves in turn tested by SSPX Priests and Seminarians who found them to be Modernist heretics on these and other questions:
[Excerpts from Wikipedia]
1: Ordination of married men will soon be a normal thing.
2: Truth changed with the times.
3: Traditional conception of the “Resurrection of Our Lord” were open to discussion.
The seminarians and staff objected to these as scandalous.
In response, and in great anger, Lefebvre wrote a “Declaration” in which he strongly attacked the modernist and liberal trends that he saw as apparent in the reforms being undertaken within the church at that time:
“We adhere with all our heart and all our soul to Catholic Rome, guardian of the Catholic Faith and the traditions necessary to maintain it, and to Eternal Rome, mistress of wisdom and truth. On the other hand we refuse and have always refused to follow the Rome of the neo-Modernist and the new Protestant trend which was clearly evident in the Second Vatican Council and, after the Council in all the reforms which flowed from it.“
The Commission of Cardinals declared in reply that the declaration was “unacceptable on all points”.
In January 1975 the new Bishop of Fribourg, Pierre Mamie, stated his wish to withdraw the SSPX’s pious union status.
Arbp LeFebvre was called to Rome for a close examination, and his strong adherence to orthodox Catholic Faith led to his Society’s approval being withdrawn by the Vatican Bishops and Pope Paul VI one year later in 1975.
He was forbidden from saying the Tridentine Mass as that would be a break from orthodox Catholicism. He was forbidden from ordaining Priests and administering the Sacraments. Approaching the end of his life, he was forbidden by Pope John Paul II from consecrating new Bishops to sustain the Order to follow him after his impending death (operation survival).
He was advised by a Canonist that this suspension of his Society was *not* in accord with a Canon Law, sloppy, and was this rendered invalid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcel_Lefebvre
[End Excerpts]
All this sound familiar? It sure does to me, except for him it was hidden; for us it is blatant and out in the open.
In short, he alone was in accord with constant Church Teaching and orthodoxy. He was persecuted for speaking out against Modernist heresy in High Places; for refusing to incorporate Modernist heresy in his Society and his own faith. He was forced to choose: heresy or schism. He chose schism.
And here we are, 35 years later, in a Church Catholics in any other age would not recognize, idols on the Altar, sodomites at the communion rail, Priests’ back to God, two visible Popes and Mass cancelled indefinitely in our holiest season of the Liturgical year – collective shoulder shrug.
The Society of St. Pius X that chose orthodoxy over schism? Their Masses would fit nicely in any era of Church history. Their doctrine – sound. Straight as an arrow. In a parched land, their Masses have the power to bring tears to one’s eyes.
I don’t know about anyone else … I personally feel like I am making the same choice as Archbishop LeFebvre: Orthodoxy or schism. With precious little support from anyone. Alone, more or less alone, just like Arbp LeFebvre.
God always leaves a way out, that we may endure and prevail.
I choose orthodoxy and constant Church Teaching, all Her Creeds and Dogmas which have not and cannot change. I thus choose schism with the Church of Abrahamic Religion and its Pope of revolution Bergóglio, Vicar of himself.
I don’t know +++ Pell personally, in fact, I only vaguely was aware that somebody of that name existed way over the other side of the country from me until I saw Richard Dawkins make a fool of him (and the rest of us) in a televised “debate”. At that point I dismissed him as a card-carrying sycophant of the “New V II Church” trying to accommodate the Church to fashionable worldly opinions.
However, when his “trial” came about I looked into more about him. Sure! he was a “loyal son Of the New Church” trying to carry the official flag but he’s also a tough but gentle man of some integrity. He was a staunch defender of the rudiments of the Faith, morality and the family. He got way offside with the zeitgeist by refusing to give Holy Communion to a bunch of provacateurs who invaded one of his Masses brandishing their “rainbow colours” and by a relentless encouragement, especially to young people, to stick with Catholic values. It’s no wonder that the Masonic establishment hated him!
It is my opinion that he was invited to the Vatican to be the apparently “good guy” who’d put a thick coat of whitewash over the Vatican’s financial “improprieties”. When it was becoming apparent that he didn’t “suit the purpose” it was arranged with Melbourne’s Masons to stitch him up and discredit him and get him out of the way… something the anti-Catholic establishment would relish with drooling enthusiasm. It worked! but there is a growing undercurrent of opposition to the corrupt establishment that may have made them try to regain some credibility by taking a step back.
The present Vatican protocol is completely inverted from the old Church protocol whereby if a cleric (or religious) is found guilty of “sins against nature” by a canonical court then they should be forbidden to act in the name of the Church (defrocked?) and handed over to the civil authorities “even if the penalty might be death”. (I think that was the edict from St Pius V).
These days it seems that, far from being horrified and determined to rid the Church from all sorts of predators, the plan is to protect perverts until “heat” from civil authorities forces them to take some token action.
If the matter goes before a Canonical Court I wouldn’t like George Pell’s chances because the narcissistic sock puppets, poofters and paedophiles in the “New Church” have much more at stake than Melbourne’s Masons.
Please see what’s happened near Philadelphia.
https://sspxphiladelphia.com/important-and-sad-announcement/