Canon212 Update: The Most Common Word in the Latest Synod Document is ‘Document’

4 Thoughts on “Canon212 Update: The Most Common Word in the Latest Synod Document is ‘Document’”

1. Aqua on October 30, 2022 at 9:53 am said:

   Ann Barnhardt has another excellent meditation on the current undeclared schism in the Catholic Church. She, of course, explains it in her own unique style of inference – understand the complex by drawing inferences from what is simple.

   Her point: “The Standard of Schism is Unity With the Pope, NOT Unity With the Majority” … and … the Pope cannot be the cause of disunity because the Pope is “welded” to God … a titular “Pope” who is the cause of disunity, ipso facto, must not be the Pope … and … the numbers of people who believe a certain thing don’t define reality; Truth itself defines reality without regard to the size of the relative proportion of people who believe it.

   https://www.barnhardt.biz/2022/10/30/the-standard-of-schism-is-unity-with-the-pope-not-unity-with-the-majority/

   The problem with this thesis that jumps out at me: her prime thesis is that the true Pope, Benedict XVI, is the willing cause of the greatest heresy in the history of the RCC: the Papacy can be split into multiple visible Popes, one with the Office of Divine connection to God and others with the power of practical governance.

   Pope Benedict XVI, “standard of unity”, by her own admission, is at the same time cause of the gravest schism and collapse of Faith the Church has ever known.

   How can this be, when under her base premise that a Pope, by being “welded” to God, *CAN NOT* be the cause of disunity and schism?

   She insists that he chose this path willingly, according to the theological plan laid out in the heretical “Miller Thesis”. And if that is true, then he is a pertinacious heretic that renders him the willing and pertinacious cause of schism. Which she just said is also impossible.

   Which is why another explanation makes more sense to me.

   Pope Benedict XVI is not a heretic but a prisoner. He is the victim of mutiny. He is like a ship Captain, commissioned by the King to sail the King’s Ship upon the high seas, performing the King’s mission of conquest. While sailing his crew began ignoring orders from the Captain, taking the ship in other directions than the Captain desired and using her resources for their own malign purposes rather than the explicit will of the commissioning King, the true owner of the Ship and crew. The true Captain was left standing in a corner of the bridge, ignored. Ultimately, he was placed, under arrest and under guard, in his cabin – the ship now under command of a new Captain … without a commission but with full practical power (until such time as the King meets the ship with his full military force one day and reclaims his own). Under this premise, the Pope (Captain) is not in error, not heretical, in rebellion, in schism. … he is under duress, a prisoner of the heretics.

   In short: Pope Benedict took the Papacy into hiding, a state of Impediment – to save it from violence until such time as Our Lord can reclaim His Ship and punish the pirate criminals. He retains the true Commission; true actual power. The Pirates merely have the helm for a time.
   • Aqua on October 30, 2022 at 10:16 am said:

     Final thought in reference to whether Pope Benedict XVI is victim of mutiny or willing participant:

     Remember the apocryphal comment, allegedly made to his chronicler Peter Seewald in answer to the question of “why he didn’t just solve the problems besetting the Church with firm Papal proclamations agains them”: “In reality”, (Benedict said, pointing to his office door) “my authority ends at that door”.

     That sounds like a prisoner who has totally lost the obedience of his crew, confirmed by their immediate change of “charted course” and “mission” once given full practical power.
     • Aqua on October 31, 2022 at 11:32 pm said:

       What follows is a passage from a prescient book, Windswept House, written 20 years before the actual event described in this excerpt of the novel: a discussion among the “Concillium of 13”, a satanic analogue to the 12 Apostles (hat tip Barnhardt); a discussion of a coup, a mutiny, satanic pirates “taking away the helm of the Ship, our Ark”:

       – quote –

       “… The Categoric Choice by which we will achieve our goal is resignation. Briefly stated, the present holder of the office will be induced to resign from that office — and without prejudice.

       “A voluntary papal resignation, at this crux of divisiveness and disunity among the ordinary RC laity and between churchmen themselves, would be a powerful signal; nothing less than an admission of defeat for important elements who stand against us. It would be a declaration to the remaining defenders of the old order of things that the past is irretrievable. Indeed the climate is such that there is already a certain sympathy among the old order for our Chosen Alternative. An openly expressed sympathy, we might add, in strategic quarters within the target ranks.

       “When we speak of inducing the holder to resign, inducement must be understood in its subtlest form. We speak of effecting all the means at your disposal in the world. For the most powerful inducement will be the pressure of irreversible events and the emergence of irresistible power lines. Events and power lines must be devised to constrict the actions of the holder. The only one course left to him will be resignation of the papal office”.

       – end quote –

       All the signs are there in real time – this Catholic disaster accelerating into violent oblivion, and the world with it, quite frankly. The book is just an apocryphal anecdote by a close participant with knowledge of the events he describes – but written as it was in what now seems a lifetime ago … it sure seems prophetic now. Author Malachi Martin even includes a much younger WEF Nazi Klaus Schwab in his story (Jacques Deneuve), and other well known names of infamy.

       https://www.fisheaters.com/catholiclibrary-windseptkey.html

       Our Pope was rendered prisoner by pirate criminals. But the funny thing is … *he didn’t resign the office*, that which they wanted (in the passage above)! He specifically did not give them the all-important Papal office which they plotted and schemed for. Instead … brave Pope Benedict XVI took the Papacy into a state of impediment; witholding the holy essence of the office and its connection to Almighty God from the satanic criminals. That is what I believe.
2. Maxine on October 30, 2022 at 1:14 pm said:

   “I know it means something.” Yes, Frank, it does. With the Pontifex Maximus playing Vicar of Peace these days in the Colosseum, it’s no wonder to me that he might keep the spectacle going by throwing some laurels at the dwarf soccer players.
   In Roman times, the indigenous “Pygmaioi” were, like all exotic animals and “strange” birds, valuable props and even occult fetishes, regularly exploited as entertainment in the arena or at dinner parties, their performances of “mythological” highjinks and horseplay also displayed in iconic classical art.

   The 1st century Roman poet Statius describes Pygmy games in the Colosseum thus: “Then in turn come forth the bold battalions of dwarfs… These join in battle and deal wounds; see, with Lilliputian hands they menace each his fellow with death; while Father Mars and murderous Valor, and the cranes, ere in random raid they pounce, marvel at the courage of the pygmies.” “Nor,” he warned, “let anyone mock… the Troglodytes and the Pygmies. ”

   In the 3rd century, the Greek Philostratus wrote of all Pygmaioi as “brothers” of [Gaia’s] Mother Earth’s strongman King Antaios, high-spirited athletes… very skilful archers… They are very just and have the same laws as the Indians… But ah, their boldness! Here they are advancing against Hercules and undertaking to kill him in his sleep; though they would not fear him even if he were awake.”

   Yes, Francis is nodding off again, revelling in fantasies and follies, as he did during the recent communal orisons. So sad!