FRANCIS USES THE MONEY WE HAVE GIVEN TO THE CHURCH TO TAKE EXPENSIVE TRIPS TO PUBLICLY DENY CHRIST
HOLY FRANCIS TO VICTIM YOUTH: THE CHURCH BEFORE I APPEARED DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE GOSPEL
POPE FRANCIS: MALICIOUS FOOL
GOP WHIP SCALESE FORCES VOTE ON BABIES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
THE US CONGRESS IS A DEN OF INIQUITY
NO ONE IS MORE EMBARRASSED BY APOSTOLIC ZEAL THAN A DECADENT JESUIT
COMPUTERS AREN’T INTELLIGENT.
FRANCIS’S ‘HOLY REFUGEE’ IS AN ARTIFACT FROM A CATHOLIC ERA HE’S WHICH ABUSING FOR AN EVIL AGENDA
WHILE IT MAY BE THE CASE THAT THE CONCILIAR CHURCH-OF-MAN DOES NOT GROW BY PROSELYTISM, THE HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH MOST CERTAINLY DOES.
VERRECCHIO: JORGE BERGOGLIO HAS MADE IT PERFECTLY PLAIN THAT HE IS NOT, THEREFORE, A MEMBER OF THE BODY OF CHRIST, AND THIS BY HIS OWN DOING. EVERY SELF-IDENTIFIED CATHOLIC WITH EARS TO HEAR AND EYES TO SEE KNOWS IT
AN AMAZING FILM EXPERIENCE: UNPLANNED RIPS THE MASK OFF PLANNED PARENTHOOD!
ST. ISIDORE: DEFENDER OF THE FAITH
PERVCHURCH: HAPPY 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF FRANCISSAINT PAUL VI’S REPULSIVE, CHURCH-WRECKING REPLACEMENT MASS
I’ve noticed that Louie Verrecchio consistently writes as if Bergoglio and Benedict are equally evil; either to appease his large sede audience or he himself is skewing that way. Case in point from your linked article: “It is crucial for readers to understand that Jorge Bergoglio is not making this madness up as he goes along; rather, he is simply carrying on the conciliar revolution like Benedict did before him, and John Paul II before him, and Paul VI, etc., albeit in ways that are at times more shocking to the authentic Catholic conscience.”
Also, similar statements in this article: https://akacatholic.com/on-proselytism-francis-following-in-benedicts-footsteps/
Fr. Paul Kramer: “The argument that Pope Benedict can equally be accused of heresy is utterly fallacious. In the works of Ratzinger there is a profession of belief in dogma, but there is also a warped understanding of dogma rooted in theology based on a framework of modern philosophy; in Bergoglio, there is a patent malice of unbelief; a conscious rejection of the “absolute truth” of dogma and the “moral absolutes”.
I will present a systematic exposition on the question of the Bergoglian “pontificate” vs. the true and valid pontificate of Benedict XVI, in Vol. II of this work. But to those who object saying, “Why on earth do you think he’s (Benedict) any better than Francis?” I reply: The “god” of Jorge “Francis” Bergoglio is the “world soul” (anima mundi) of Shaftesbury, Teilhard de Chardin, and the ‘ancient Mysteries’ of the Pagans and Freemasons – i.e. the pandeistic Deus of Natura of Spinoza. The God Pope Benedict XVI professes is the God of Christians – the God of the apostles, prophets and philosophers; as he eloquently explained in his first part of his first major work, Einfuhrung in das Christentum.
Bergoglio’s religion worships the “god” of Spinoza in the reformed and dogma denying ecumenical “church” of doctrinal and moral relativism that is emerging out of the post-conciliar Church – the Bergoglian counterfeit “church” which apes the Catholic Church and usurps its name – and which is now seen to be in the process of visibly separating itself from the Catholicism of the past two millennia. Pope Benedict XVI professes and worships the true God of Catholic dogma, as does the remnant Church of which he remains the true pope and supreme Pontiff, in spite of the mass of confusion among the faithful and clergy concerning the identity of the true pope.
Both men, the true pope and the false pope will die, but the false “church” and the true Church will survive their deaths. It does not suffice for salvation that a Catholic resist false doctrine and personally adhere to the true dogma of Faith; but one must remain within the fold of the true Church of Jesus Christ as a member of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. The Catholic must visibly separate himself from the organization of those who visibly separate themselves from the true Church by their public defection from the faith into heresy, but who remain as illegitimate squatters and usurpers within the material structural framework formerly occupied by the Catholic Church and identified pertaining to it.”
https://storage.googleapis.com/wzukusers/user-29953306/documents/5b8bd7790493bJaBjfkU/2018%20Sept%20Newsletter.pdf
Quote from “The Dialogue” of St Catherine of Siena; God the Eternal Father speaking: “Because of the dignity and authority I have give them [priests], it never has nor ever will be my will that the hand of civil law should touch them for any sin of theirs. To do so would be a wretched offense against me. No, it is my will that they be held in due reverence, not for what they are in themselves, but for my sake, because of the authority I have given them. […] You ought to despise and hate the ministers’ sins, and try to dress them in the new clothes of charity and holy prayer, and wash away their filth with your tears. In other words, you should hold them out to me with tears and great desire, so that I in my goodness may clothe them with the garment of charity. […] But you are not to judge them. Leave the judging to me, and I, because of your prayers and my own desire, will be merciful to them. If they will not change their ways, the dignity they have will be their destruction. pp. 229-231
I think the Francis Lumpy Hand is phony. Why is his hand sticking out in that photo? Phony. It’s “see I have an owie on my hand so it hurts to let people grab it and kiss that big ring.” Sympathy please.
So the “experts” are going to redo the pharisees. But of course that”s been the scheme all along. “Rigid” Christians are the real pharisees and Bergoglio has been laying the groundwork for this deception for years. Ask those chaps from the sanhedrin if they intend to alter their Talmud which has Jesus burning in excrement and identifies his mother as a prostitute. Not a chance. This “ecumenical” dialogue has always been a one way street…another fraud. It’s not only Perv Church, it’s Judas Church.