PILLAR FRANCISVATICAN’S FULL OF SPIES
FRANCIS DOES A STUNTSTINT IN ONE OF THOSE TILTED, NOT REALLY CONFESSIONALS WITH HOLES IN IT.
MAGISTER: WE OLD SQUARES NEED TO LEARN FROM THE AUTHENTIC YOUTHS, MAN.
JIM CAVIEZEL TO LEAD ROSARY RALLY IN OHIO AHEAD OF AUG. 8 VOTE ON ISSUE 1
FDA ANNOUNCES RECALL OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE
MEAT GRINDER: UKRAINE LOSES 43,000 SOLDIERS SINCE JUNE 4, 1420 IN LAST 2 DAYS; 3 US VETS DEAD
GERMANY: ANOTHER HOMOSEX WEDDING FARCE
WYD: BISHOP ATTACKS PRIEST WHO REFUSED TO HAND OUT COMMUNION
BRAZIL: BOOM IN PRIEST SUICIDES
WYD: “IN HIS SPEECHES, FRANCIS DIDN’T TALK ABOUT CHRIST, SIN OR SALVATION, BUT RAMBLED ON ABOUT BEING “PROTAGONISTS OF A ‘NEW CHOREOGRAPHY’ AND PUTTING THE HUMAN PERSON AT THE CENTRE.””
All antipope Bergoglio had to do was respond with five little words. Seven years now … just five simple little si’s or no’s. 2,510 days to answer basic dogmatic questions: are we still on the same dogmatic path to heaven; has anything changed; is the RC Church still Catholic? Jorge Bergoglio has talked about everything else there is to talk about. But those five core Dubia questions are strictly forbidden.
Instead, we have Dave Armstrong writing another essay, (he might think he’s the first to try … he is not), justifying why no answer has been forthcoming and … the Dubia don’t really matter anyway.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2023/08/pope-francis-has-answered-the-five-dubia-in-his-teachings.html
Lots and lots of words spilled by Armstrong to simply agree with antipope Bergoglio: “what difference at this point does it make!?” “Whatever, man”.
What else can he say? The Dubia sit there like a marker, unanswered, and to note the obvious reason why they sit there in a dusty corner of Bergoglio’s closet is to be forced to face uncomfortable facts about this man who can’t give us just five little words, just 10 little letters – are we still Catholic or no? There’s a reason Dave, the Dubia remains unanswered, and it’s not for you to answer for him. It appears the answer is no. Something is seriously amiss.
Something to consider: Ann Barnhardt pointed out a few years back that a dubia is only possible for a true Pope. So, has Bergoglio’s refusal to answer been testifying to the truth of his validity (or lack of it), all these years.?